Publications
Detailed Information
Policy conflict and its settlement in Korea: the case of regulatory reform
Cited 0 time in
Web of Science
Cited 0 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 1993
- Citation
- Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol.8, pp. 33-57
- Description
- This is the summarizsed version of Ph.D. dissertation in Ohio State University, 1992.
- Abstract
- Policy making can be defined as the specification of policy content, a set of policy
goals and instruments. This specification can be made through two stages: position
taking and coordination.
Usually due to their interests and values, major policy actors in the policy making
process have not only concern for the content of the policy to be made but also
some ideas and preference for it. They internally transform these ideas and preferences
into their policy positions, and then push their positions externally against
other incompatible positions.
When policy actors push different policy positions from somewhat independent
power bases, policy conflict ensues. Coordination among them is needed. The outcome
of policy coordination can not always be the same as each actor intends.
Original policy content can be maintained, or partially deleted from or added to, or
changed into completely new one, or evaporated into the air. More than two policy
positions can be coordinated in integrative or distributive fashion.
- ISSN
- 1225-5017
- Language
- English
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.