Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of American and third world students' preferences for conventional and alternative development ideas

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChung, Il Hwan-
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-24-
dc.date.available2010-11-24-
dc.date.issued1992-
dc.identifier.citationKorean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol.7, pp. 99-111-
dc.identifier.issn1225-5017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/70370-
dc.description.abstractThe issue of development has been widely discussed during the last four decades
on social science. For over four decades the subject has been debated and examined
from different perspectives. Theoretical perspectives on development have changed
in response to the changing historical reality of the development process and of relations
between developing and developed countries (Lehmann, 1979; Ardent, Evans
and Stephens, 1988).
In the 1950s and 1960s, the decades hall-marked by an intense interest in development
themes, the classical development model was popular in the world and most
countries adopted this strategy to achieve their economic development. In the
1980s, skepticism towards development theories such as modernization and human
capital theories produced other development positions, e.g., the dependency
school, world system approach, Neo-Marxism and so on.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherGraduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University-
dc.titleComparison of American and third world students' preferences for conventional and alternative development ideas-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정일환-
dc.citation.journaltitleKorean Journal of Policy Studies-
dc.citation.endpage111-
dc.citation.pages99-111-
dc.citation.startpage99-
dc.citation.volume7-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share