Publications
Detailed Information
Comparison of American and third world students' preferences for conventional and alternative development ideas
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Il Hwan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-24 | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-11-24 | - |
dc.date.issued | 1992 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol.7, pp. 99-111 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-5017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/70370 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The issue of development has been widely discussed during the last four decades
on social science. For over four decades the subject has been debated and examined from different perspectives. Theoretical perspectives on development have changed in response to the changing historical reality of the development process and of relations between developing and developed countries (Lehmann, 1979; Ardent, Evans and Stephens, 1988). In the 1950s and 1960s, the decades hall-marked by an intense interest in development themes, the classical development model was popular in the world and most countries adopted this strategy to achieve their economic development. In the 1980s, skepticism towards development theories such as modernization and human capital theories produced other development positions, e.g., the dependency school, world system approach, Neo-Marxism and so on. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University | - |
dc.title | Comparison of American and third world students' preferences for conventional and alternative development ideas | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 정일환 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | Korean Journal of Policy Studies | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 111 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 99-111 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 99 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 7 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.