Publications

Detailed Information

Chinese Classifiers and Count Nouns

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYi, Byeong-Uk-
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-06T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-06T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cognitive Science, Vol.10 No.2, pp. 209-226-
dc.identifier.issn1598-2327-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/70762-
dc.description.abstractMany linguists, philosophers, and anthropologists hold that classifier languages,
including Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Thai, have no count nouns,
and that all their common nouns are mass nouns. This paper argues that Chinese
draws a syntactic, as well as semantic, distinction between mass and count
nouns, and suggests how the approach taken to clarify the distinction can be
extended to other classifier languages.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInstitute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectclassifier-
dc.subjectcount noun-
dc.subjectmass noun hypothesis-
dc.subjectnumber-
dc.subjectquantity-
dc.subjectquantifier-
dc.subjectmeasure word-
dc.titleChinese Classifiers and Count Nouns-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이병욱-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of cognitive science-
dc.citation.endpage226-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages209-226-
dc.citation.startpage209-
dc.citation.volume10-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share