광무양안의 자료적 성격 재고찰

Abstract

This study summarized the flow aud point at issue of Gwang-mu Yangau(光武量案)research history. Up to now, the study on Gwang-mu Yaugau has made

considerable achievements, but recently is not so good. This is mainly because of

confrontation between schools, aud I think that the point at issue can't progress

unless the relevaut researchers return to the initial consciousness of a problem, that

is, the problem of how to understaud the materials named Gwaug-mu Yaugau. In

the future, it would be necessary to restore the contemporary agricultural reality aud

ownership-management scope, etc. through Gwaug-mu Yaugau, and to collect a

variety of relevaut materials aud seek a new methodology for utilizing them in the

study on local history.

Next, this study outlined the features of the type aud contents of Gwaug-mu

Yangan. First I divided Gwang-mu Yangan stored in Kyujanggak into three forms of

Yangii Amun(量地衛門), that is, Middle & initial copy(中草本), Fair copy(正書本) aud

Jigye Amun(地契衛門) form, aud again classified them by areas aud times to make a

table. Then, features by forms were more classified, aud the size of books by forms

aud the number of books by Myeon(面) were aualyzed. Also, in relation to the

order of books, it was found that the classification system performed by Imperialist

Japan needs to be re-adjusted. With regard to the contents, it is noted that there

was a more positive attempt to grasp Jinjeon(陳田) in Jigye Amun form. In relation

to that, the real aspect about Jinieon was aualyzed centering around Gyeonggi-do(京

載道). In most case of Gyeonggivdo Yangji Amun form, the ratio of Silgyeol(lU5,

actually cultivated land grasp of more thau 99.85. In addition to that, it was

confirmed through cases of Gwaugjubu(廣州府) that, in Yaugau of Yangji Amun form, individual land was not checked one by one whether or not it was really

cultivated, but a large tract of land was recorded as Jinieon for some special reason.