Publications
Detailed Information
Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: Amalgam, SuperEBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baek, Seung-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Woo Cheol | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Syngcuk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Setzer, Frank C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-13T02:26:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-13T02:26:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | J Endod 2010;36(8):1323–1325 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0099-2399 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/74085 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine
the bone regeneration potential to different rootend filling materials by evaluating the distance between the materials and newly regenerated bone after root-end surgery. Material and Methods: Periapical lesions were induced in premolars and molars of five female beagle dogs. The teeth were treated endodontically after the development of the lesions. After 1 week, the teeth underwent root-end surgery using modern microsurgical techniques. Three different root-end filing materials were used: amalgam (Tytin; Kerr Mfg Co, Romulus, MI), SuperEBA (Bosworth, Skokie, IL), and mineral trioxide aggregates (MTA; Dentsply, York, PA). After 4 months, the dogs were sacrificed, and the jaws were prepared for histological sectioning. The distances from the root-end filling materials to the regenerated bone were determined by the evaluation of microradiographic images of the sections with imaging software (Sigma Scan/Image; Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA). The results were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance using Sigma Stat software (Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA). Results: The mean distances from the newly regenerated bone were 0.397 0.278 mm in the MTA group, 0.756 0.581 mm in the Super- EBA group, and 1.290 0.386 mm in the amalgam group. There was a statistically significant difference between the amalgam and MTA groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences existed for amalgam versus SuperEBA and SuperEBA versus MTA. Conclusion: MTA showed the most favorable periapical tissue response. The distance from MTA to the regenerated bone was similar to the normal average periodontal ligament thickness in dogs. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en |
dc.subject | amalgam | en |
dc.subject | apical bone regeneration | en |
dc.subject | microradiograph | en |
dc.subject | mineral trioxide aggregate | en |
dc.subject | root-end seal | en |
dc.subject | SuperEBA | en |
dc.title | Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: Amalgam, SuperEBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 백승호 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이우철 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김신국 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.