Publications

Detailed Information

Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hyojeong-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yongtae-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-02T06:03:28Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-02T06:03:28Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-
dc.identifier.citationSCIENTOMETRICS; Vol.84 3; 543-561-
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/74992-
dc.description.abstractIntermediaries in a technological knowledge network have recently been highlighted as crucial innovation drivers that accelerate technological knowledge flows. Although the patent network analysis has been frequently used to monitor technological knowledge structures, it has examined only sources or recipients of the technological knowledge by mainly estimating technological knowledge inflows or outflows of a network node. This study, therefore, aims to identify technological knowledge intermediaries when a technology-level knowledge network is composed of several industries. First, types of technological knowledge flows are deductively classified into four types by highlighting industry affiliations of source technologies and recipient technologies. Second, a directed technological knowledge network is generated at the technology class level, using patent co-classification analysis. Third, for each class, mediating scores are measured according to the four types. The empirical analysis illustrates the Korea''''''''s technological knowledge network between 2000 and 2008. As a result, the four types of mediating scores are compared between industries, and industry-wise technological knowledge intermediaries are identified. The proposed approach is practical to explore converging processes in technology development where technology classes act as technological knowledge intermediaries among diverse industries.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.subjectTechnological knowledge intermediary-
dc.subjectNetwork analysis-
dc.subjectIndustry affiliation-
dc.subjectPatent co-classification-
dc.titleIdentification of technological knowledge intermediaries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임효정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박용태-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11192-009-0133-8-
dc.citation.journaltitleSCIENTOMETRICS-
dc.description.citedreferenceNO HJ, 2009, TECHNOLOGIC IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2009.06.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceMa ZZ, 2008, TECHNOVATION, V28, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.011-
dc.description.citedreferenceLISSONI F, 2008, ACAD INVENTORS BROKE-
dc.description.citedreferenceLeydesdorff L, 2007, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V58, P1303, DOI 10.1002/asi.20614-
dc.description.citedreferenceShin J, 2007, INF ECON POLICY, V19, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.01.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceHeinze T, 2007, SCIENTOMETRICS, V70, P811, DOI 10.1007/s11192-007-0313-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceOkamura K, 2006, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V18, P535, DOI 10.1080/09537320601019677-
dc.description.citedreferenceShin J, 2006, SCIENTOMETRICS, V69, P551-
dc.description.citedreferenceHowells J, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAN YJ, 2006, WORLD PATENT INFORM, V28, P235, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.WPI.2006.01.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceHO M, 2006, EUROPES EC LEARN, P50-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen DZ, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V64, P31-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurt RS, 2004, AM J SOCIOL, V110, P349-
dc.description.citedreferenceKeenan M, 2003, J FORECASTING, V22, P129, DOI 10.1002/for.849-
dc.description.citedreferenceBreschi S, 2003, RES POLICY, V32, P69-
dc.description.citedreferenceLacasa ID, 2003, SCIENTOMETRICS, V57, P175, DOI 10.1023/A:1024133517484-
dc.description.citedreferenceRonde P, 2001, RES POLICY, V30, P1041-
dc.description.citedreferenceHALL B, 2001, W8498 NBER SOC SCI R-
dc.description.citedreferenceVERSPAGEN B, 2001, KNOW C ATH GREEC-
dc.description.citedreferenceOPPENHEIM C, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC, P405-
dc.description.citedreferenceVerspagen B, 1999, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V11, P211-
dc.description.citedreferenceVerspagen B, 1999, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V60, P215-
dc.description.citedreferenceJAFFE AB, 1999, EC INNOVATION NEW TE, V8, P105-
dc.description.citedreferenceArundel A, 1998, RES POLICY, V27, P127-
dc.description.citedreferenceVERSPAGEN B, 1997, EC SYSTEMS RES, V9, P47-
dc.description.citedreferenceYOFFIE DB, 1997, COMPETING AGE DIGITA-
dc.description.citedreferenceArchibugi D, 1996, TECHNOVATION, V16, P451-
dc.description.citedreferenceGrupp H, 1996, J EVOL ECON, V6, P175-
dc.description.citedreferenceFERNANDEZ RM, 1994, AM J SOCIOL, V99, P1455-
dc.description.citedreferenceENGELSMAN EC, 1994, RES POLICY, V23, P1-
dc.description.citedreference*OECD, 1994, OCDEGD94114-
dc.description.citedreferenceGRILICHES Z, 1990, J ECON LIT, V28, P1661-
dc.description.citedreferenceGOULD RV, 1989, SOCIOL METHODOL, V19, P89-
dc.description.citedreferenceTODOROV R, 1989, SCI TECHNOLOGY INDIC, P261-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEYDESDORFF L, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V11, P295-
dc.description.citedreferenceJAFFE AB, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P984-
dc.description.citedreferenceBASBERG BL, 1984, WORLD PATENT INFORM, V6, P158-
dc.description.citedreferenceGALASKIEWICZ J, 1984, SOCIOL QUART, V25, P527-
dc.description.citedreferencePAVITT K, 1984, RES POLICY, V13, P343-
dc.description.citedreferenceMARSDEN PV, 1982, SOCIAL STRUCTURE NET, P201-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHERER FM, 1982, RES POLICY, V11, P227-
dc.description.citedreferenceFREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35-
dc.description.citedreferenceBURT RS, 1976, SOC FORCES, V55, P93-
dc.description.citedreferenceBAVELAS A, 1948, APPLIED ANTHR, V7, P16-
dc.description.tc1-
dc.identifier.wosid000280274400001-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share