Browse

A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jaewook-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Suk-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seoung Bum-
dc.contributor.authorRosenberger, Jay-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-02T06:04:18Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-02T06:04:18Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationCOMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; Vol.58 3; 521-527-
dc.identifier.issn0360-8352-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75003-
dc.description.abstractBecause weapon systems are perceived as crucial in determining the outcome of a war, selecting weapon systems is a critical task for nations. Just as with other forms of decision analysis involving multiple criteria, selecting a weapon system poses complex, unstructured problems with a huge number of points that must be considered. Some defense analysts have committed themselves to developing efficient methodologies to solve weapon systems selection problems for the Republic of Korea''''''''s (ROK) Armed Forces. In the present study, we propose a hybrid approach for weapon systems selection that combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the weights to assign to the factors that go into these selection decisions. These weights are inputted into a goal programming (GP) model to determine the best alternative among the weapon systems. The proposed hybrid approach that combines AHP, PCA and GP process components offsets the shortcomings posed by obscurity and arbitrariness in AHP and therefore can provide decision makers with more reasonable and realistic decision criteria than AHP alone. A case study on weapon system selection for the air force demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of the proposed hybrid AHP PCA GP approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subjectMultiple criteria decision analysis-
dc.subjectPrincipal component analysis-
dc.subjectWeapon systems-
dc.subjectGoal programming-
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy process-
dc.titleA hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강석호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성범-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013-
dc.citation.journaltitleCOMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-
dc.description.citedreferenceDagdeviren M, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P8143, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceHo W, 2008, EUR J OPER RES, V186, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004-
dc.description.citedreference*MIN NAT DEF REP K, 2008, DEF WHIT PAP-
dc.description.citedreferenceVaidya OS, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V169, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028-
dc.description.citedreferenceKONG F, 2005, INT J INFORM SYSTEMS, V1, P406-
dc.description.citedreferenceWang G, 2005, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V25, P93, DOI 10.1007/s00170-003-1791-y-
dc.description.citedreferenceYurdakul M, 2004, ROBOT CIM-INT MANUF, V20, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.rcim.2003.11.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE-
dc.description.citedreferenceIGNIZIO JP, 1980, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V5, P15-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 1990, MULTICRITERIA DECISI-
dc.description.citedreferenceMIN H, 1991, J OPER RES SOC, V42, P301-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchniederjans MJ, 1997, EUR J OPER RES, V100, P72-
dc.description.citedreferenceKwak NK, 1998, EUR J OPER RES, V110, P234-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim PO, 1999, ANN NUCL ENERGY, V26, P449-
dc.description.citedreferenceCheng CH, 1999, EUR J OPER RES, V116, P423-
dc.description.citedreferenceBadri MA, 1999, INT J PROD ECON, V62, P237-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee CW, 1999, J OPER RES SOC, V50, P1191-
dc.description.citedreferenceBadri MA, 2001, INT J PROD ECON, V72, P27-
dc.description.citedreferenceJOLLIFFE IT, 2002, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT-
dc.description.citedreferenceJOHNSON RA, 2002, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST-
dc.description.citedreferenceKwak NK, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V140, P447, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00082-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceCheng CH, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V142, P174-
dc.description.citedreferenceAHN CW, 2003, STUDY DETERMINING MI-
dc.description.citedreferenceGreiner MA, 2003, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V50, P192, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2003.810827-
dc.description.citedreferenceWang G, 2004, INT J PROD ECON, V91, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00221-4-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 2005, THEORY APPL ANAL NET-
dc.description.citedreferenceKwak NK, 2005, EUR J OPER RES, V166, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceBertolini M, 2006, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V91, P839, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceHO W, 2007, IEEE INT C SYST MAN, P714-
dc.description.citedreferenceREDDY RM, 2007, INT J COMPUTER SCI N, V7, P108-
dc.description.citedreferenceSHUMUELI G, 2007, DATA MINING BUSINESS-
dc.description.tc1-
dc.identifier.wosid000276920300019-
Appears in Collections:
College of Engineering/Engineering Practice School (공과대학/대학원)Dept. of Industrial Engineering (산업공학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_산업공학과)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse