Browse

Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hakyeon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yongtae-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hoogon-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-05T02:31:06Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-05T02:31:06Z-
dc.date.issued2009-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH; Vol.196 3; 847-855-
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75346-
dc.description.abstractThe strategic importance of performance evaluation of national R&D programs is highlighted as the resource allocation draws more attention in R&D policy agenda. Due to the heterogeneity of national R&D programs'''''''' objectives, however, it is intractably difficult to relatively evaluate multiple programs and. consequently, few studies have been conducted on the performance comparison of the R&D programs. This study measures and compares the performance of national R&D programs using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Since DEA allows each DMU to choose the optimal weights of inputs and outputs which maximize its efficiency, it can mirror R&D programs'''''''' unique characteristics by assigning relatively high weights to the variables in which each program has strength. Every project in every R&D program is evaluated together based on the DEA model for comparison of efficiency among different systems. Kruskal-Wallis test with a post hoc Mann-Whitney U test is then run to compare performance of R&D programs. Two alternative approaches to incorporating the importance of variables, the AR model and output integration, are also introduced. The results are expected to provide policy implications for effectively formulating and implementing national R&D programs. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subjectData envelopment analysis-
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy process-
dc.subjectR&D evaluation-
dc.subjectNational R&D program-
dc.subjectR&D performance-
dc.titleComparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이학연-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박용태-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최후곤-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016-
dc.citation.journaltitleEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH-
dc.description.citedreferenceCherchye L, 2007, SOC INDIC RES, V82, P111, DOI 10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7-
dc.description.citedreferenceWang EC, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceSwink M, 2006, J OPER MANAG, V24, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceEilat H, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V172, P1018, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceKOCHER MG, 2006, SOCIOECONOMIC PLANNI, V40, P314-
dc.description.citedreferenceGarg KC, 2005, SCIENTOMETRICS, V65, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11192-005-0264-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEE H, 2005, ASIAN J TECHNOL INNO, V13, P207-
dc.description.citedreferenceFENG YJ, 2004, INT T OPERATIONAL RE, V11, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00450.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceZhang AM, 2003, J COMP ECON, V31, P444, DOI 10.1016/S0147-5967(03)00055-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceTAKAMURA Y, 2003, SOCIOECONOMIC PLANNI, V37, P85-
dc.description.citedreferenceParadi JC, 2002, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V49, P161, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2002.1010884-
dc.description.citedreferenceKorhonen P, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V130, P121-
dc.description.citedreference*OECD, 2001, OECD SCI TECHN IND S-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOOPER WW, 2000, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANA-
dc.description.citedreferenceADAMS JD, 2000, EC ECONOMETRICS INNO-
dc.description.citedreferenceRosen D, 1998, J PROD ANAL, V9, P205-
dc.description.citedreferenceAllen R, 1997, ANN OPER RES, V73, P13-
dc.description.citedreferenceGraves SB, 1996, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V53, P125-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee MS, 1996, RES POLICY, V25, P805-
dc.description.citedreferenceBRINN T, 1996, ACCOUNT BUSINESS RES, V26, P265-
dc.description.citedreferenceSHANG J, 1995, EUR J OPER RES, V85, P297-
dc.description.citedreferenceNEDERHOF AJ, 1993, RES POLICY, V22, P353-
dc.description.citedreferenceBOUSSOFIANE A, 1991, EUR J OPER RES, V52, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceTHOMPSON RC, 1990, MEAS SCI TECHNOL, V1, P93-
dc.description.citedreferenceBANKER R, 1989, RES GOVT NONPROFIT A, V5, P125-
dc.description.citedreferenceDYSON RG, 1988, J OPER RES SOC, V39, P563-
dc.description.citedreferenceNEDERHOF AJ, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V11, P330-
dc.description.citedreferenceBANKER RD, 1984, MANAGE SCI, V30, P1078-
dc.description.citedreferenceBOUND J, 1984, R D PATENT PRODUCTIV-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHERER FM, 1983, INT J IND ORGAN, V1, P107-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHARNES A, 1978, EUR J OPER RES, V2, P429-
dc.description.tc6-
dc.identifier.wosid000263817600001-
Appears in Collections:
College of Engineering/Engineering Practice School (공과대학/대학원)Dept. of Industrial Engineering (산업공학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_산업공학과)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse