Publications
Detailed Information
To defend mereological reductionism from 2 objections
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jun-hyo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-21T08:40:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-21T08:40:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 철학논구, Vol.39, pp. 85-101 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/75637 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I will deal with what mereological reductionism is,
what problem occurs if we accept mereological reductionism and how we could avoid the objections against mereological reductionism. Mereological reductionism is a doctrine to say that the whole can be reduced to the parts. But the mereological reductionist encounters at least two serious objections. One is dilemma style objection, and the other is so-called sinkhole objection. Here I will present my own answers to these objections. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | 서울대학교 철학과 | - |
| dc.title | To defend mereological reductionism from 2 objections | - |
| dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
| dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이준효 | - |
| dc.citation.journaltitle | 철학논구 | - |
| dc.citation.endpage | 101 | - |
| dc.citation.pages | 85-101 | - |
| dc.citation.startpage | 85 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 39 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.