Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of Monthly Ibandronate Versus Weekly Risedronate in Preference, Convenience, and Bone Turnover Markers in Korean Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChung, Yoon-Sok-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sung-Kil-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Ho-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, In-Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ghi-Su-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Moo-Il-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong-Ki-
dc.contributor.authorShong, Min Ho-
dc.contributor.authorByun, Dong-Won-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Nam-Hee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yil-Seob-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Chan Soo-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Hyun-Koo-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Woong Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Dong-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Yong-Ki-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Il-Hyung-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-24T06:15:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-24T06:15:24Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.citationCALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL; Vol.85 5; 389-397ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0171-967X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76420-
dc.description.abstractPatient preferences, convenience, and bone turnover markers were evaluated for the monthly ibandronate over the weekly risedronate regimen in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a two-period and two-sequence crossover treatment design. After a 30-day screening period, eligible participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to receive either monthly oral ibandronate 150 mg for 3 months followed by weekly oral risedronate 35 mg for 12 weeks (sequence A) or the same regimen in reverse order (sequence B). Patient preference and convenience were evaluated by questionnaire. The changes in serum C-telopeptide after 3 months of treatment were analyzed. A total of 365 patients were enrolled in this study (sequence A 182, sequence B 183). Of patients expressing a preference (83.4%), 74.8% preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen over the weekly regimen (25.2%). More women stated that the monthly ibandronate regimen was more convenient (84.2%) than the weekly regimen (15.8%). There was no significant difference in the change in bone turnover marker between the two treatments. The two regimens were similarly tolerable. There were fewer adverse events in the monthly ibandronate group compared to the weekly risedronate group in terms of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea and abdominal distension). This study revealed a strong preference and convenience for monthly ibandronate over weekly risedronate in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. There was no significant difference in change of bone turnover marker and safety profile between the two regimens.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSPRINGERko_KR
dc.subjectIbandronateko_KR
dc.subjectKoreanko_KR
dc.subjectConvenienceko_KR
dc.subjectPreferenceko_KR
dc.subjectRisedronateko_KR
dc.titleComparison of Monthly Ibandronate Versus Weekly Risedronate in Preference, Convenience, and Bone Turnover Markers in Korean Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Womenko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정윤속-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정호연-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이인규-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박일형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김기수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor민용기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강무일-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정동진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최웅환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송민호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박지현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor변동원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤현구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor신찬수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이일섭-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor권남희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임성길-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00223-009-9294-y-
dc.citation.journaltitleCALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL-
dc.description.citedreferenceCurtis JR, 2009, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V20, P973, DOI 10.1007/s00198-008-0772-2-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarris ST, 2009, BONE, V44, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceHadji P, 2008, JOINT BONE SPINE, V75, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.07.011-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiller PD, 2008, CURR MED RES OPIN, V24, P207, DOI 10.1185/030079907X253889-
dc.description.citedreferenceKamatari M, 2007, J BONE MINER METAB, V25, P302, DOI 10.1007/s00774-007-0768-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceTakada J, 2007, J BONE MINER METAB, V25, P142, DOI 10.1007/s00774-006-0739-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceCooper A, 2006, INT J CLIN PRACT, V60, P896, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01059.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceRossini M, 2006, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V17, P914, DOI 10.1007/s00198-006-0073-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceReginster JY, 2006, BONE, V38, pS2, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.150-
dc.description.citedreferenceEmkey R, 2005, CURR MED RES OPIN, V21, P1895, DOI 10.1185/030079905X74862-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiller PD, 2005, J BONE MINER RES, V20, P1315, DOI 10.1359/JBMR.050313-
dc.description.citedreferenceJahng KH, 2005, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V57, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceEpstein S, 2005, MAYO CLIN PROC, V80, P379-
dc.description.citedreferenceBARTL R, 2005, OSTEOPOROS INT S3, V16, pS45-
dc.description.citedreferenceDelmas PD, 2004, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V15, P792, DOI 10.1007/s00198-004-1602-9-
dc.description.citedreferenceCramer JA, 2004, J BONE MINER RES, V19, pS448-
dc.description.citedreferenceEttinger M, 2004, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V50, pS513-
dc.description.citedreferenceKendler D, 2004, MATURITAS, V48, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.12.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceEisman JA, 2004, CURR MED RES OPIN, V20, P699, DOI 10.1185/030079904125003548-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHESNUT IC, 2004, J BONE MINER RES, V19, P1241, DOI DOI 10.359/JBMR.040325-
dc.description.citedreferenceTosteson ANA, 2003, AM J MED, V115, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00362-0-
dc.description.citedreferenceHamilton B, 2003, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V14, P259, DOI 10.1007/s00198-002-1370-3-
dc.description.citedreference*WHO, 2003, WHO TECH REP SER, V921, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceRICHTER A, 2003, CLIN THER, V25, P2306-
dc.description.citedreferenceSimon JA, 2002, CLIN THER, V24, P1871-
dc.description.citedreferenceUmland EM, 2001, CLIN THER, V23, P1409-
dc.description.citedreferenceClaxton AJ, 2001, CLIN THER, V23, P1296-
dc.description.citedreferenceLOMBAS C, 2001, J BONE MINER RES S1, V15, pS529-
dc.description.citedreferenceLanza FL, 2000, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V119, P631-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarris ST, 1999, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V282, P1344-
dc.description.citedreferenceLIBERMAN UA, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1437-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOOPER C, 1992, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V2, P285-
dc.description.citedreferencePRESCOTT RJ, 1981, APPLIED STATISTICS, V30, P9-
dc.description.citedreferenceGART JJ, 1969, BIOMETRIKA, V56, P75-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share