Publications

Detailed Information

An efficient and reliable DNA extraction method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comparison of allele drop out and amplification rates using different single cell lysis methods

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung Ah-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Jung Ah-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Moon Joo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Young Min-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Shin Yong-
dc.contributor.authorChae, Soo Jin-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T02:08:28Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-04T02:08:28Z-
dc.date.issued2009-08-
dc.identifier.citationFERTILITY AND STERILITY; Vol.92 2; 814-818ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0015-0282-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76757-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate methods of DNA extraction from single cells for their suitability to amplify and provide a correct diagnosis of target disease genes. Design: Experimental study. Setting: University hospital laboratory. Patient(s): Two normal adult male and female blood donors. Intervention(s): Exon 51 of the dystrophin gene and the ZFX/ZFY gene were amplified from single lymphocytes using nested PCR. Five different methods of DNA extraction were tested (lysis in distilled water with freezing and thawing using liquid nitrogen, lysis in distilled water, alkaline lysis buffer, Proteinase K/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer, and N-lauroylsarcosine salt solution). Main Outcome Measure(s): Allele drop out and amplification rate. Result(s): The amplification efficiency from single unaffected lymphocytes was 89.0% using the liquid nitrogen method, 88.1% with the distilled water lysis method, 97.5% with the alkaline lysis buffer method, 91.5% with the Proteinase K/SDS lysis buffer method, and 84.8% using the N-lauroylsarcosine salt solution method. The mean allele drop out rate was 16.7%, 43.9%, 2.0%, 9.8%, and 18.9%, respectively, for each lysis method using single male lymphocytes as a template. Conclusion(s): Based on these results, DNA extraction using an alkaline lysis buffer results in more efficient rates of DNA amplification and less allele drop out than the other methods of DNA extraction tested. This method is suitable for the lysis of single cells in clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:814-8. (c) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCko_KR
dc.subjectAllele drop outko_KR
dc.subjectpreimplantation genetic diagnosisko_KR
dc.subjectnested polymerase chain reactionko_KR
dc.subjectDNA amplificationko_KR
dc.subjectDNA extractionko_KR
dc.titleAn efficient and reliable DNA extraction method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comparison of allele drop out and amplification rates using different single cell lysis methodsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤정아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강문주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최영민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor채수진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문신용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.033-
dc.citation.journaltitleFERTILITY AND STERILITY-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurlet P, 2006, MOL HUM REPROD, V12, P647, DOI 10.1093/molehr/gal069-
dc.description.citedreferenceLledo B, 2006, FERTIL STERIL, V86, P949, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.036-
dc.description.citedreferenceRenwick P, 2006, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V13, P110-
dc.description.citedreferenceSpits C, 2006, HUM MUTAT, V27, P496, DOI 10.1002/humu.20324-
dc.description.citedreferenceMichaelides K, 2006, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V95, P373, DOI 10.1160/TH05-08-0574-
dc.description.citedreferenceTsuchiya S, 2005, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V22, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10815-005-7482-x-
dc.description.citedreferenceHellani A, 2005, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V10, P376-
dc.description.citedreferenceHellani A, 2004, MOL HUM REPROD, V10, P847, DOI 10.1093/molehr/gah114-
dc.description.citedreferenceHandyside AH, 2004, MOL HUM REPROD, V10, P767, DOI 10.1093/molehr/gah101-
dc.description.citedreferenceGirardet A, 2003, MOL HUM REPROD, V9, P421, DOI 10.1093/molehr/gag050-
dc.description.citedreferenceSutterlin M, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P1231-
dc.description.citedreferenceHussey ND, 1999, MOL HUM REPROD, V5, P1089-
dc.description.citedreferenceWells D, 1998, PRENATAL DIAG, V18, P1389-
dc.description.citedreferenceRechitsky S, 1998, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V15, P253-
dc.description.citedreferenceLissens W, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P1756-
dc.description.citedreferenceRay PF, 1996, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V13, P104-
dc.description.citedreferenceGitlin SA, 1996, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V13, P107-
dc.description.citedreferenceDreesen JCFM, 1996, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V13, P112-
dc.description.citedreferenceFINDLAY I, 1995, HUM REPROD, V10, P1609-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEVINSON G, 1992, HUM REPROD, V7, P1304-
dc.description.citedreferenceHANDYSIDE AH, 1990, NATURE, V344, P768-
dc.description.citedreferenceCUI XF, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P9389-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share