Publications
Detailed Information
Histologic Chorioamnionitis is More Common after Spontaneous Labor than after Induced Labor at Term
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, H. S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Romero, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, S. M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, C. W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, B. H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jun, J. K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-04T05:49:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-04T05:49:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PLACENTA; Vol.31 9; 792-795 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0143-4004 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/76784 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Inflammation of the chorioamniotic membranes (histologic chorioamnionitis) is a risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome. Labor has many common features with inflammatory processes; therefore, an important question is whether the frequency of histologic chorioamnionitis in spontaneous labor at term is higher than that of women in labor after induction. This study was conducted to address this question. Study design: The frequency of histologic chorioamnionitis was compared between patients who delivered after the spontaneous onset of labor versus those who delivered after induction of labor at term in singleton gestations (>= 37 weeks). Patients in whom uterotonic agents were used during the latent phase of labor were excluded. Results: (1) The overall frequency of histologic chorioamnionitis was 20.2% (107/531); (2) histologic chorioamnionitis was significantly more frequent in women who delivered after the spontaneous onset of labor than in those who underwent induction of labor (24.3% [81/333] versus 13.1% [26/198], p < 0.005). This difference remained significant after adjusting for parity, gestational age at delivery, total duration of labor, the interval from rupture of membranes to delivery and the mode of delivery. Conclusion: Histologic chorioamnionitis is more common in women who delivered after the spontaneous onset of labor than in those who underwent induction of labor at term. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | W B SAUNDERS CO LTD | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Placental inflammation | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Spontaneous onset of labor | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Inflammation | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Infection | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Term pregnancy | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Parturition | ko_KR |
dc.title | Histologic Chorioamnionitis is More Common after Spontaneous Labor than after Induced Labor at Term | ko_KR |
dc.type | Article | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.06.013 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | PLACENTA | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lee SM, 2011, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V24, P37, DOI 10.3109/14767058.2010.482622 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mittal P, 2009, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V22, P1167, DOI 10.3109/14767050903019692 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lee J, 2009, J PERINAT MED, V37, P53, DOI 10.1515/JPM.2009.036 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Gotsch F, 2008, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V21, P529, DOI 10.1080/14767050802127349 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Chaiworapongsa T, 2008, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V21, P449, DOI 10.1080/14767050802054550 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | SEONG HS, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V199, pE371 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Romero R, 2006, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V113, P17, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lee SE, 2006, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V19, P693, DOI 10.1080/14767050600927353 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Haddad R, 2006, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V195, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.0557 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Levey KA, 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V103, P724, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000118308.65550.f6 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Wu YW, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V290, P2677 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Yoon BH, 2003, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V189, P919, DOI 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00839-1 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Yoon BH, 2001, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V185, P1130 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Hershkovitz R, 2001, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V97, P141 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Wu YW, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V284, P1417 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Keski-Nisula L, 2000, HUM PATHOL, V31, P841 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Keelan JA, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V181, P1530 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Thomson AJ, 1999, HUM REPROD, V14, P229 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Yoon BH, 1998, OBSTET GYNECOL, V92, P77 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Grether JK, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V278, P207 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | YOON BH, 1995, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V172, P960 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | HILLIER SL, 1991, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V165, P955 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | HILLIER SL, 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V319, P972 | - |
dc.description.tc | 2 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.