Publications

Detailed Information

Effectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea: Results from a cohort study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJun, Jae Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Kui Son-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Kyu Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hoo-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Eun-Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Keun-Young-
dc.contributor.authorGapstur, Susan M.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-08T07:30:03Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-08T07:30:03Z-
dc.date.issued2009-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER; Vol.124 1; 188-193ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0020-7136-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76918-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the value of cervical cancer screening is widely acknowledged, the effectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea has never been evaluated. We investigated the associations of the frequency of cervical cancer screening with cervical cancer incidence using data from a large prospective cohort study. In this analysis, 253,472 women without a hysterectomy or previous cancer diagnosis were included. Follow-up was between 1995 and 2002. Frequency of Pap smear testing was determined by searching the National Health Examination Database. Using the Korean Central Cancer Registry, 248 cases of invasive cervical cancer and 346 cases of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the cervix were identified. Subjects screened 2 or more times showed a 71% (corrected reduction 611%) and a 66% (corrected reduction 53%) reduced risk of invasive cervical cancer and CIS of the cervix, respectively, as compared with unscreened subjects [relative risk (RR) = 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.20-0.45; RR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.25-0.46, respectively]. Women with a normal or benign pap smear had a statistically significantly lower risk of invasive cervical cancer and CIS of cervix compared with those never screened. In age-stratified analyses, there was a significant reduction in cervical cancer incidence among women aged 30 and over who were screened 2 or more times compared with women never screened. The results of this prospective cohort study show that regular screening of cervical cancer reduces invasive cervical cancer incidence and CIS of the cervix among Korean women. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss. Inc.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherWILEY-LISSko_KR
dc.subjectcervical cancerko_KR
dc.subjectPap smearko_KR
dc.subjecteffectivenessko_KR
dc.subjectcohort studyko_KR
dc.subjectscreeningko_KR
dc.titleEffectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea: Results from a cohort studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전재관-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최귀손-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정규원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이후연-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박은철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor유근영-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijc.23841-
dc.citation.journaltitleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER-
dc.description.citedreferenceShin HR, 2008, INT J CANCER, V122, P393, DOI 10.1002/ijc.23015-
dc.description.citedreferenceSung NY, 2007, BRIT J CANCER, V97, P700, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603893-
dc.description.citedreferenceCURDO MP, 2007, IARC SCI PUBLICATION, V160-
dc.description.citedreferenceCanfell K, 2006, MED J AUSTRALIA, V185, P482-
dc.description.citedreferenceAklimunnessa K, 2006, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V36, P511, DOI 10.1093/jjco/hyl060-
dc.description.citedreferenceLynge E, 2006, J MED SCREEN, V13, P41-
dc.description.citedreferenceParkin DM, 2005, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V55, P74-
dc.description.citedreferenceKLEINBAUM DG, 2005, SURVIVAL ANAL A SELF, P522-
dc.description.citedreferenceAnttila A, 2004, BRIT J CANCER, V91, P935, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602069-
dc.description.citedreferenceHerbert A, 2004, BRIT J CANCER, V90, P1108, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601596-
dc.description.citedreferenceSirovich BE, 2004, J GEN INTERN MED, V19, P243-
dc.description.citedreferenceChan PG, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V102, P765, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00696-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceMizoue T, 2003, INT J CANCER, V106, P103, DOI 10.1002/ijc.11183-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiller AB, 2002, EUR J CANCER, V38, P321-
dc.description.citedreferenceNygard JF, 2002, J MED SCREEN, V9, P86-
dc.description.citedreferenceSigurdsson K, 2001, INT J CANCER, V94, P884-
dc.description.citedreferenceWALTER SD, 2001, QUANTITATIVE METHODS, P115-
dc.description.citedreferenceCoppell K, 2000, NEW ZEAL MED J, V113, P48-
dc.description.citedreferenceMILLER AB, 2000, INT J CANCER, V86, P440-
dc.description.citedreferenceZAPPA M, 2000, EVALUATION MONITORIN, P99-
dc.description.citedreferenceLYNGE E, 2000, EVALUATION MONITORIN, P119-
dc.description.citedreferenceNieminen P, 1999, INT J CANCER, V83, P55-
dc.description.citedreferenceMILLER AB, 1999, CANC SCREENING THEOR, P195-
dc.description.citedreferenceNIEMINEN P, 1995, OBSTET GYNECOL, V85, P1017-
dc.description.citedreferenceLAARA E, 1987, LANCET, V1, P1247-
dc.description.citedreferenceBRESLOW NE, 1987, IARC SCI PUBLICATION, V82-
dc.description.citedreference*WHO, 1986, SCREEN CANC UT CERV-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOLE P, 1980, J NATL CANCER I, V64, P1263-
dc.description.tc8-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share