Publications

Detailed Information

Assessment of variation in Elekta® plastic spherical-calibration phantom and its impact on the Leksell Gamma Knife® calibration

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNovotny, Josef, Jr.-
dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Jagdish P.-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hyun-Tai-
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Lijun-
dc.contributor.authorHuq, M. Saiful-
dc.contributor.authorBednarz, Greg-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-14T00:50:54Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-14T00:50:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-
dc.identifier.citationMEDICAL PHYSICS; Vol.37 9; 5066-5071ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77057-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Traditionally, the dose-rate calibration (output) of the Leksell Gamma Knife (R) (LGK) unit is performed using a 160 mm diameter plastic spherical phantom provided by the vendor of the LGK, Elekta Instrument AB. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variations in the Elekta spherical phantom and to assess its impact and use for the LGK calibration. Methods: Altogether, 13 phantoms from six different centers were acquired, 10 of these phantoms were manufactured within the past 10 years and the last 3 approximately 15-20 years ago. To assess variation in phantoms, the diameter and mass densities were measured. To assess the impact on LGK calibration, the output of two models of LGK (LGK Perfexion (TM) and LGK 4C) were measured under identical irradiation conditions using all 13 phantoms for each LGK model. Results: The mean measured deviation in diameter from expected nominal 160 mm for 13 phantoms was 0.51 mm (range of 0.09-1.51 mm). The mean measured phantom mass density for 13 phantoms was 1.066 +/- 0.019 g/cm(3) (range of 1.046-1.102 g/cm(3)). The percentage deviation of output for individual phantom from mean of 13 phantom outputs ranged from -0.37% to 0.55% for LGK Perfexion (TM). Similarly, the percentage deviation of output for individual phantom from mean of 13 phantom outputs ranged from -0.72% to 0.47% for LGK 4C. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that small variations in terms of phantom size and mass density of the phantom material do not have a significant impact on dose-rate measurements of the Leksell Gamma Knife (R). Also, date of manufacture of the phantom did not show up to be a significant factor in this study.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherAMER ASSOC PHYSICISTS MEDICINEko_KR
dc.subjectradiosurgeryko_KR
dc.subjectcalibration phantomsko_KR
dc.subjectsmall field dosimetryko_KR
dc.subjectdosimetric measurementsko_KR
dc.subjectLeksell Gamma Knifeko_KR
dc.titleAssessment of variation in Elekta® plastic spherical-calibration phantom and its impact on the Leksell Gamma Knife® calibrationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정현태-
dc.identifier.doi10.1118/1.3481508-
dc.citation.journaltitleMEDICAL PHYSICS-
dc.description.citedreferenceNOVOTNY J, 2010, 15 INT M LEKS UNPUB-
dc.description.citedreferenceKumar R, 2010, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS, V11, P24-
dc.description.citedreferenceMa LJ, 2009, PHYS MED BIOL, V54, P3897, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/54/12/019-
dc.description.citedreferenceBhatnagar JP, 2009, MED PHYS, V36, P1208, DOI 10.1118/1.3093240-
dc.description.citedreferenceMeltsner SG, 2009, MED PHYS, V36, P339, DOI 10.1118/1.3049587-
dc.description.citedreferenceNOVOTNY J JR, 2009, MED PHYS, V36, P1768-
dc.description.citedreferenceAlfonso R, 2008, MED PHYS, V35, P5179, DOI 10.1118/1.3005481-
dc.description.citedreferenceDrzymala RE, 2008, MED PHYS, V35, P514, DOI 10.1118/1.2828187-
dc.description.citedreferenceLindquist C, 2007, NEUROSURGERY, V61, P130, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000279989.86544.B6-
dc.description.citedreferenceKurjewicz L, 2007, MED PHYS, V34, P1007, DOI 10.1118/1.2437282-
dc.description.citedreference*LEKS GAMM KNIF, 2005, 01733701 LEKS GAMM K-
dc.description.citedreferenceAraki F, 2003, MED PHYS, V30, P1976, DOI 10.1118/1.1587451-
dc.description.citedreferenceTsai JS, 2003, MED PHYS, V30, P986, DOI 10.1118/1.1567736-
dc.description.citedreferenceBednarz G, 2002, PHYS MED BIOL, V47, P3643, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/47/20/306-
dc.description.citedreferenceMack A, 2002, MED PHYS, V29, P2080, DOI 10.1118/1.1501138-
dc.description.citedreference*INT AT EN AG, 2000, TECHN REP SER, V398-
dc.description.citedreferenceAlmond PR, 1999, MED PHYS, V26, P1847-
dc.description.citedreference*INT AT EN AG, 1997, TECHN REP SER, V277-
dc.description.citedreferenceHARPER CA, 1996, HDB PLASTICS ELASTOM-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHULZ J, 1983, MED PHYS, V10, P741-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share