Publications
Detailed Information
A Technical Strategy for Carotid Artery Stenting: Suboptimal Prestent Balloon Angioplasty Without Poststenting Balloon Dilatation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jin, Sung-Chul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwon, O-Ki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Chang Wan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Cheolkyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Hee-Joon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Young Sub | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Hyun-Seung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Moon Hee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sang Hyung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Moon Gu | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-14T01:45:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-14T01:45:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | NEUROSURGERY; Vol.67 5; 1438-1442 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0148-396X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/77065 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Traditional carotid artery stenting (CAS) consists of predilatation, optional deployment of embolic protection devices, stenting, and poststent angioplasty. Each step carries a risk of thromboembolism. OBJECTIVE: To design a new and simplified procedural protocol, suboptimal balloon angioplasty without routine poststenting balloon dilatation, and to describe the efficacy this protocol in terms of procedural risks and angiographic and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Over a period of 6 years, 161 carotid artery stenoses in 156 consecutive patients were treated by CAS with embolic protection devices. Among them, 110 lesions in 107 patients (68.3%) were treated by our simplified method (symptomatic, > 50% stenosis; asymptomatic, > 70% stenosis). Overall, 98 lesions (88.3%) had severe stenosis (> 70%). RESULTS: The mean stenosis was reduced from 77% to 10% after CAS. A persistent neurological deficit developed in 2 patients from thromboembolism. Hemodynamic insufficiency developed in 14 lesions during CAS (12.7%). The ipsilateral stroke and mortality rate was 4.5% within 1 month after CAS (asymptomatic, 3.6%; symptomatic, 4.8%). Over a mean of 19 months of follow-up, additive angioplasty was performed in 2 patients as a result of progressive restenosis (>= 50%). A comparison of the balloon sizes of the prestent angioplasty for group 1 (balloon, <= 4 mm) and group 2 (balloon, >= 5 mm) showed no difference in restenosis between the groups at 15 months of follow-up after CAS. CONCLUSION: Our CAS technique with suboptimal prestenting angioplasty without routine use of poststenting dilatation is safe, simple, and efficient with acceptable risks. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Balloon angioplasty | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Thromboembolism | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Embolic protection device | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Carotid artery stent | ko_KR |
dc.title | A Technical Strategy for Carotid Artery Stenting: Suboptimal Prestent Balloon Angioplasty Without Poststenting Balloon Dilatation | ko_KR |
dc.type | Article | ko_KR |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 진성철 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 권오기 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 오창완 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 정철규 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 한문구 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 배희준 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이상형 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 정영섭 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 한문희 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 강현승 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f07c97 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | NEUROSURGERY | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Bussiere M, 2008, J NEUROSURG, V109, P454, DOI 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/9/0454 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Im SH, 2008, J ENDOVASC THER, V15, P110 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Maynar M, 2007, AM J NEURORADIOL, V28, P1378, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A0543 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Skelly CL, 2006, J VASC SURG, V44, P1010, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.039 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Gray WA, 2006, J VASC SURG, V44, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Reimers B, 2006, J ENDOVASC THER, V13, P429 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Roubin GS, 2006, CIRCULATION, V113, P2021, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595512 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Gupta R, 2006, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V47, P1538, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.079 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Goodney PP, 2006, J VASC SURG, V43, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.11.012 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Cayne NS, 2005, J VASC SURG, V41, P956, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.02.038 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lownie SP, 2005, AM J NEURORADIOL, V26, P1241 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Yadav JS, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P1493 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mozes G, 2004, J VASC SURG, V39, P958, DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.037 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mlekusch W, 2003, J ENDOVASC THER, V10, P851 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Leisch F, 2003, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V58, P516, DOI 10.1002/ccd.10483 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Martin JB, 2001, STROKE, V32, P479 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Vitek JJ, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1736 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Dangas G, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P677 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Qureshi AI, 1999, STROKE, V30, P2086 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | 1991, N ENGL J MED, V325, P445 | - |
dc.description.tc | 0 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.