Publications

Detailed Information

CT Perfusion with Angiography as a Substitute for both Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography and Acetazolamide-Challenged SPECT in the Follow-Up of Postbypass Patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jung Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jeong Eun-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Hyun-Seung-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Chul-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Chang Wan-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Moon Hee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Soo-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-15T01:15:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-15T01:15:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationCEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES; Vol.30 6; 547-555ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1015-9770-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77098-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of CT perfusion (CTP) with angiography (CTA) as an alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and acetazolamide (ACZ)-challenged single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the follow-up evaluation of hemodynamic changes and bypass patency after bypass surgery in chronic cerebral ischemic diseases. Methods: Thirty-five patients who underwent superficial temporal artery/middle cerebral artery bypass surgery for chronic cerebral ischemic diseases were retrospectively enrolled. We assessed the relationship between CTP parameters [cerebral blood volume, cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT), affected-to-unaffected hemisphere (ATU) ratio of perfusion parameters and MTT differences between hemispheres] and SPECT parameters (regional CBF and cerebrovascular reserve) and compared the preoperative CTP parameters with the postoperative ones. For the bypass patency, we compared CTA with DSA. Results: MTT showed the best correlation with CVR of SPECT (r = -0.343; p < 0.001). ATU ratio (r = -0.547; p < 0.001) and ATU differences (r = -0.592; p < 0.001) of MTT correlated well with the ATU ratio of rCBF on ACZ-challenged SPECT. Significant improvement of perfusion parameters could be demonstrated in the affected vascular territory with postoperative CTP. The CTA findings were consistent with those of DSA in 96% of the cases. The examination-related complication rate was 0, 2.8 and 8.6% for CT studies, DSA and SPECT, respectively. Conclusions: CTP performed simultaneously with CTA seems to be a safe and efficient substitute for DSA and ACZ-challenged SPECT in the follow-up evaluation after bypass surgery in patients with chronic cerebral ischemic diseases. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Baselko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherKARGERko_KR
dc.subjectAcetazolamideko_KR
dc.subjectCerebrovascular disorderko_KR
dc.subjectSPECTko_KR
dc.subjectFollow-up studiesko_KR
dc.subjectCerebral revascularizationko_KR
dc.subjectCerebral angiographyko_KR
dc.subjectPerfusion imagingko_KR
dc.titleCT Perfusion with Angiography as a Substitute for both Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography and Acetazolamide-Challenged SPECT in the Follow-Up of Postbypass Patientsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박정철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김정은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강현승-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor손철호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이동수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오창완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한문희-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000319026-
dc.citation.journaltitleCEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES-
dc.description.citedreferenceLin K, 2009, CEREBROVASC DIS, V28, P72, DOI 10.1159/000219300-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim JE, 2008, CEREBROVASC DIS, V25, P580, DOI 10.1159/000132205-
dc.description.citedreferenceWaaijer A, 2007, AM J NEURORADIOL, V28, P927-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHELLINGER PD, 2007, CEREBROVASC DIS, V24, P16-
dc.description.citedreferenceYata K, 2006, STROKE, V37, P534, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000199085.40000.cf-
dc.description.citedreferenceHirai Y, 2005, CEREBROVASC DIS, V20, P463, DOI 10.1159/000088986-
dc.description.citedreferenceTeksam M, 2004, EUR J RADIOL, V52, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceHoeffner EG, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V231, P632, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2313021488-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee HY, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P202-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiles KA, 2003, BRIT J RADIOL, V76, P220, DOI 10.1259/bjr/13564625-
dc.description.citedreferenceKudo K, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P419-
dc.description.citedreferenceTsuchiya K, 2003, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V27, P231-
dc.description.citedreferenceKuroda S, 2001, STROKE, V32, P2110-
dc.description.citedreferenceRoberts HC, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1077-
dc.description.citedreferenceIwama T, 2001, NEUROSURGERY, V48, P504-
dc.description.citedreferenceWintermark M, 2001, EUR RADIOL, V11, P1220-
dc.description.citedreferenceDerdeyn CP, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V53, P251-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchumann P, 1998, BRAIN, V121, P1369-
dc.description.citedreferenceKODOMA T, 1995, CLIN RADIOL, V50, P459-
dc.description.citedreferenceNARIAI T, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P563-
dc.description.citedreferenceHEISERMAN JE, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1401-
dc.description.citedreferenceHIRANO T, 1994, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V14, P763-
dc.description.citedreferenceMATSUDA H, 1991, CLIN NUCL MED, V16, P572-
dc.description.citedreferenceHEISS WD, 1991, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V10, P687-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAKANO S, 1989, J NUCL MED, V30, P157-
dc.description.citedreferenceBISHOP CCR, 1987, BRIT J SURG, V74, P802-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEBLANC R, 1987, J NEUROSURG, V66, P529-
dc.description.citedreferenceGIBBS JM, 1987, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V50, P140-
dc.description.citedreferenceVORSTRUP S, 1986, STROKE, V17, P1291-
dc.description.citedreferenceAXEL L, 1983, INVEST RADIOL, V18, P94-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share