Browse

Validation of Self-Reported Cancer Incidence at Follow-up in a Prospective Cohort Study

Cited 17 time in Web of Science Cited 17 time in Scopus
Authors
Cho, Lisa Y.; Kim, Cheong-Sik; Li, Lian; Yang, Jae Jeong; Shin, Aesun; Lee, Kun-Sei; Yoo, Keun-Young; Park, Sue K.; Kim, Hyeongsu; Chang, Soung Hoon; Park, Boyoung
Issue Date
2009-09
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citation
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY; Vol.19 9; 644-646
Keywords
Cancer incidenceCohort follow-upSelf-report
Abstract
Self-reported cancer is a valuable epidemiological tool for
identifying cases in cohort studies. The cost, time, and
resources required, in addition to the efficiency in ascertaining
cases, need to be considered when deciding between
active and passive follow-up approaches. Because Korean
families hold a family-centered approach when making decisions
(1), it is not uncommon for patients to be unaware of
their cancer diagnosis or status. A total of 20% of physicians
and 33% of family members opposed patient notification of
his or her disease status (2), and only 35% of Korean-Americans
would tell a patient about a terminal prognosis (1).
Because of these cultural differences and, thus, inaccuracies
in self-reported information that arise, there is a need to
examine the appropriateness of the active follow-up approach in ascertaining incident cancer cases. The objectives
of the study were to assess the validity and reliability
of self-reported cancer at follow-up and to examine the relative
efficiencies of the active and passive follow-up methods
in identifying incident cancer cases.
ISSN
1047-2797
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/77521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.04.011
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Preventive Medicine (예방의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_예방의학전공)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse