Publications

Detailed Information

Biological characteristics and treatment outcomes of metastatic or recurrent neuroendocrine tumors: tumor grade and metastatic site are important for treatment strategy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Su-Jung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Won-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sae-Won-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Do-Youn-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Se-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong-Wan-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Seock-Ah-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae-You-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Dae Seog-
dc.contributor.authorBang, Yung-Jue-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-27T07:08:18Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-27T07:08:18Z-
dc.date.created2020-04-08-
dc.date.created2020-04-08-
dc.date.issued2010-08-23-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer, Vol.10, p. 448-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.other95273-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77622-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Studies about the biology, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome of metastatic/recurrent neuroendocrine tumor (NET) have been few. Methods: We enrolled patients with metastatic/recurrent NET diagnosed between January 1996 and July 2007 and retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 103 patients were evaluated. Twenty-six patients (25.2%) had pancreatic NET, 27 (26.2%) had gastrointestinal NET, 2 (1.9%) had lung NET, 28 (27.2%) had NET from other sites, and 20 (19.4%) had NET from unknown origin. The liver was the most common metastatic site (68.9%). Thirty-four patients had grade 1 disease, 1 (1.0%) had grade 2 disease, 15 (14.6%) had grade 3 disease, 9 (8.7%) had large cell disease, and 7 (6.8%) had small cell disease. Sixty-six patients received systemic treatment (interferon, somatostatin analogues or chemotherapy), 64 patients received local treatment (TACE, radiofrequency ablation, metastasectomy, etc.). Thirty-six patients received both systemic and local treatments. Median overall survival (OS) was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval, 25.0-33.0) in the 103 patients. OS was significantly influenced by grade (p = .001). OS was 43.0, 23.0, and 29.0 months in patients who received local treatment only, systemic treatment only, and both treatments, respectively (p = .245). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 6.0 months. Overall response rate was 34.0% and disease-control rate was 64.2%. TTP was influenced by the presence of liver metastasis (p = .011). Conclusions: OS of metastatic/recurrent NET was different according to tumor grade. TTP was different according to metastasis site. Therefore, development of optimal treatment strategy based on the characteristics of NET is warranted.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleBiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of metastatic or recurrent neuroendocrine tumors: tumor grade and metastatic site are important for treatment strategy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임석아-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2407-10-448-
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Cancer-
dc.description.citedreferenceHill JS, 2009, CANCER, V115, P741, DOI 10.1002/cncr.24065-
dc.description.citedreferenceGurusamy KS, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007060.pub2-
dc.description.citedreferenceIGAWA S, 2009, LUNG CANCER, V68, P438-
dc.description.citedreferenceDAHAN L, 2009, ENDOCR RELAT CANC-
dc.description.citedreferenceRINKE A, 2009, J CLIN ONCOL-
dc.description.citedreferenceYao JC, 2008, J CLIN ONCOL, V26, P4311, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7858-
dc.description.citedreferenceKulke MH, 2008, J CLIN ONCOL, V26, P3403, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9020-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho CS, 2008, CANCER, V113, P126, DOI 10.1002/cncr.23523-
dc.description.citedreferenceYao JC, 2008, J CLIN ONCOL, V26, P3063, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377-
dc.description.citedreferenceKwekkeboom DJ, 2008, J CLIN ONCOL, V26, P2124, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2553-
dc.description.citedreferenceBettini R, 2008, ANN ONCOL, V19, P903, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdm552-
dc.description.citedreferenceVilar E, 2007, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V14, P221, DOI 10.1677/ERG-06-0074-
dc.description.citedreferenceEkeblad S, 2007, CLIN CANCER RES, V13, P2986, DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2053-
dc.description.citedreferenceBajetta E, 2007, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V59, P637, DOI 10.1007/s00280-006-0306-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceHainsworth JD, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P3548, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0575-
dc.description.citedreferencePavel ME, 2006, J INTERF CYTOK RES, V26, P8-
dc.description.citedreferenceTomassetti P, 2005, ANN ONCOL, V16, P1806, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdi358-
dc.description.citedreferenceRorstad O, 2005, J SURG ONCOL, V89, P151, DOI 10.1002/jso.20179-
dc.description.citedreferenceWirth LJ, 2004, LUNG CANCER-J IASLC, V44, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.11.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceFaiss S, 2003, J CLIN ONCOL, V21, P2689, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.142-
dc.description.citedreferenceVirgolini I, 2002, SEMIN NUCL MED, V32, P148, DOI 10.1053/snuc.2002.31565-
dc.description.citedreferenceKaltsas G, 2001, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V55, P575-
dc.description.citedreferenceFjallskog MLH, 2001, CANCER, V92, P1101-
dc.description.citedreferenceJohanson V, 1999, BRIT J CANCER, V80, P1259-
dc.description.citedreferenceMOERTEL CG, 1992, NEW ENGL J MED, V326, P519-
dc.description.citedreferenceRIDOLFI R, 1991, J CHEMOTHERAPY, V3, P328-
dc.description.citedreferenceMOERTEL CG, 1991, CANCER, V68, P227-
dc.description.citedreferenceOBERG K, 1983, NEW ENGL J MED, V309, P129-
dc.description.citedreferenceMOERTEL CG, 1980, NEW ENGL J MED, V303, P1189-
dc.description.citedreferenceRANSOM WB, 1890, LANCET, V2, P1020-
dc.description.tc0-
dc.identifier.wosid000282717900002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77955834798-
dc.citation.startpage448-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.identifier.sci000282717900002-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorOh, Do-Youn-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dong-Wan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorIm, Seock-Ah-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Tae-You-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHeo, Dae Seog-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBang, Yung-Jue-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCARCINOID-TUMORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROGNOSTIC-FACTORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHEMOTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusETOPOSIDE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEFFICACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLUOROURACIL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTREPTOZOCIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERFERON-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCISPLATIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMIDGUT-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Clinical Medicine

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share