Publications

Detailed Information

Localization of Broca`s Area Using Functional MR Imaging: Quantitative Evaluation of Paradigms

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Chi Heon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae-Hun-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Chun Kee-
dc.contributor.authorKim, June Sic-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Kun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Min-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-27T07:46:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-27T07:46:30Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY; Vol.45 4; 219-223ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn2005-3711-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77639-
dc.description.abstractObjective : Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is frequently used to localize language areas in a non-invasive manner. Various paradigms for presurgical localization of language areas have been developed, but a systematic quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of those paradigms has not been performed. In the present study, the authors analyzed different language paradigms to see which paradigm is most efficient in localizing frontal language areas. Methods : Five men and five women with no neurological deficits participated (mean age, 24 years) in this study. All volunteers were right-handed. Each subject performed 4 tasks, including fixation (Fix), sentence reading (SR), pseudoword reading (PR), and word generation (WG). Fixation and pseudoword reading were used as contrasts. The functional area was defined as the area(s) with a t-value of more than 3.92 in fMRI with different tasks. To apply an anatomical constraint, we used a brain atlas mapping system, which is available in AFNI, to define the anatomical frontal language area. The numbers of voxels in overlapped area between anatomical and functional area were individually counted in the frontal expressive language area. Results : Of the various combinations, the word generation task was most effective in delineating the frontal expressive language area when fixation was used as a contrast (p<0.05). The sensitivity of this test for localizing Broca`s area was 81% and specificity was 70%. Conclusion : Word generation versus fixation could effectively and reliably delineate the frontal language area. A customized effective paradigm should be analyzed in order to evaluate various language functions.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherKOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCko_KR
dc.subjectFunctional MRIko_KR
dc.subjectQuantitative evaluationko_KR
dc.subjectLanguageko_KR
dc.subjectParadigmko_KR
dc.titleLocalization of Broca`s Area Using Functional MR Imaging: Quantitative Evaluation of Paradigmsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김치헌-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김재훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정천기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김준식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이종민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이상건-
dc.identifier.doi10.3340/jkns.2009.45.4.219-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY-
dc.description.citedreferenceHickok G, 2007, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V8, P393, DOI 10.1038/nrn2113-
dc.description.citedreferenceKamada K, 2007, J NEUROSURG, V106, P90-
dc.description.citedreferenceTremblay P, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V33, P947, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.041-
dc.description.citedreferenceKraut MA, 2006, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V18, P1877-
dc.description.citedreferenceJansen A, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V33, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.019-
dc.description.citedreferenceGrummich P, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V32, P1793, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.034-
dc.description.citedreferenceJansen A, 2006, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V63, P1344-
dc.description.citedreferenceJoseph JE, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V32, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.175-
dc.description.citedreferenceMikuni N, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P1347, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00610.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceBenke T, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P1308, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00549.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceBalsamo LM, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V31, P1306, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.027-
dc.description.citedreferenceAnderson DP, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P998-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurton MW, 2006, CORTEX, V42, P644-
dc.description.citedreferenceBriellmann RS, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P916-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarrington GS, 2006, AM J NEURORADIOL, V27, P938-
dc.description.citedreferenceAlario FX, 2006, BRAIN RES, V1076, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.104-
dc.description.citedreferenceEickhoff SB, 2005, NEUROIMAGE, V25, P1325, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034-
dc.description.citedreferenceHugdahl K, 2004, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V47, P162, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/014)-
dc.description.citedreferenceQuinones-Hinojosa A, 2003, J NEUROSURG, V99, P311-
dc.description.citedreferenceSuzuki K, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P517-
dc.description.citedreferenceAdcock JE, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V18, P423-
dc.description.citedreferenceOjemann JG, 2002, J NEUROSURG, V97, P33-
dc.description.citedreferenceRutten GJM, 2002, BRAIN LANG, V80, P421, DOI 10.1006/brln.2001.2600-
dc.description.citedreferenceFernandez G, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P585, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2001.0854-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHUNG SH, 1997, J KOREAN NEUROSURG S, V26, P1635-
dc.description.citedreferenceCox RW, 1996, COMPUT BIOMED RES, V29, P162-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHAFFLER L, 1994, EPILEPSIA, V35, P525-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share