Publications

Detailed Information

Quantitative Assessment of Diffuse Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Atrophy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Diffuse Atrophy Imaging Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJeoung, Jin Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seok Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ki Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Myung-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T08:19:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-28T08:19:31Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10-
dc.identifier.citationOPHTHALMOLOGY; Vol.117 10; 1946-1952ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0161-6420-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77803-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate quantitatively the degree of diffuse retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) atrophy using Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Participants: One hundred two eyes of 102 patients with diffuse RNFL atrophy and 102 healthy eyes of 102 age-matched subjects were enrolled in the Diffuse Atrophy Imaging Study. Methods: Two experienced observers graded RNFL photographs of diffuse RNFL atrophy eyes using a previously reported standardized protocol with a 4-level grading system. Readings were taken from the superior and inferior RNFL areas. The OCT-measured RNFL thickness parameters were compared among normal eyes and diffuse atrophy subgroups. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) was calculated for various OCT RNFL parameters. Main Outcome Measures: Average and segmental (4 quadrants and 12 clock-hours) OCT-measured RNFL thicknesses and AROCs for various OCT parameters. Results: For superior and inferior RNFL areas, diffuse atrophy grading by 2 observers agreed in 82.5% and 83.3% of cases, respectively, with a substantial agreement (kappa value = 0.760 [P<0.001] and 0.777 [P<0.001]). Significant differences were observed in RNFL thickness among normal and all diffuse atrophy subgroups, especially in the 7 and 11 o`clock sectors (P<0.0001). The OCT RNFL thickness measurements decreased with increasing severity of RNFL damage. The 7 and 11 o`clock sectors showed the highest AROCs for discrimination of mild RNFL atrophy from normal eyes (0.972 and 0.979, respectively). Conclusions: The OCT RNFL thickness parameters showed excellent quantitative correlation with the degree of diffuse RNFL atrophy. Our results suggest that Stratus OCT may serve as a useful adjunct in accurately and objectively assessing the degree of diffuse RNFL atrophy.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCko_KR
dc.titleQuantitative Assessment of Diffuse Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Atrophy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Diffuse Atrophy Imaging Studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정진욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김석환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박기호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김동명-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.046-
dc.citation.journaltitleOPHTHALMOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceJeoung JW, 2008, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V115, P2132, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.024-
dc.description.citedreferenceJeoung JW, 2008, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V49, P1753, DOI 10.1167/iovs.07-1408-
dc.description.citedreferenceHood DC, 2007, PROG RETIN EYE RES, V26, P688, DOI 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim TW, 2007, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V48, P1635, DOI 10.1167/iovs.06-0800-
dc.description.citedreferenceHwang JM, 2006, J GLAUCOMA, V15, P223-
dc.description.citedreferenceJeoung JW, 2005, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V112, P2157, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.07.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceBourne RRA, 2005, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V46, P1280, DOI 10.1167/iovs.041000-
dc.description.citedreferenceMedeiros FA, 2004, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V122, P827-
dc.description.citedreferenceBlumenthal EZ, 2000, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V107, P2278-
dc.description.citedreferenceZangwill LM, 2000, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V107, P1309-
dc.description.citedreferenceBOWD C, 2000, SEMIN OPHTHALMOL, V15, P194-
dc.description.citedreferenceJonas JB, 1999, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V43, P293-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchuman JS, 1996, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V103, P1889-
dc.description.citedreferenceJonas JB, 1996, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V40, P369-
dc.description.citedreferenceNIESSEN AGJE, 1995, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V120, P577-
dc.description.citedreferenceWANG F, 1994, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V112, P796-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P1800-
dc.description.citedreferenceJONAS JB, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P63-
dc.description.citedreferenceHODAPP E, 1993, CLIN DECISIONS GLAUC, P204-
dc.description.citedreferenceHUANG D, 1991, SCIENCE, V254, P1178-
dc.description.citedreferenceTUULONEN A, 1991, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V111, P485-
dc.description.citedreferenceTAKAMOTO T, 1989, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V96, P1315-
dc.description.citedreferenceJONAS JB, 1989, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V30, P919-
dc.description.citedreferenceDRANCE SM, 1986, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V102, P612-
dc.description.citedreferenceAIRAKSINEN PJ, 1985, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V103, P205-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1982, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V100, P807-
dc.description.citedreferencePEDERSON JE, 1980, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V98, P490-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1980, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V98, P1564-
dc.description.citedreferenceLANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159-
dc.description.citedreferenceSOMMER A, 1977, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V95, P2149-
dc.description.citedreferenceHITCHINGS RA, 1976, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V60, P778-
dc.description.tc3-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share