Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry for Detection of Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Young Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ki Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-29T01:51:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-29T01:51:21Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA; Vol.19 4; 229-236ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1057-0829-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77873-
dc.description.abstractPurposes: To compare the ability of Stratus optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensator (GDx VCC) in recognizing a localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect identified on red-free fundus photography. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients with only 1 localized RNFL defect in either eye were taken RNFL thickness analysis using Stratus OCT and GDx VCC. Thirty-nine healthy subjects were used as controls and only 1 eye per subject was considered. Using red-free photography as the standard reference test, sensitivity and specificity for photographic defects, and topographic correlation with photographic defects were compared between Stratus OCT (sector average graph) and GDx VCC (deviation from normal map). Abnormal sectors at P < 5% compared with their internal normative database were evaluated. Results: After excluding eyes with unacceptable scan images, 38 healthy eyes and 47 glaucomatous eyes were finally included. Stratus OCT and GDx VCC showed moderate sensitivity (78.7%) and high specificity (94.7% and 89.5%, respectively), and there was no significant difference (P = 1.00 and P = 0.69, respectively). RNFL defects determined by Stratus OCT and GDx VCC were correlated well with photographic RNFL defects in terms of peripapillary localization and clock-hour size, and there was no significant difference between 2 imaging devices (P = 0.20 and P = 0.27, respectively). Conclusions: In recognizing a localized RNFL defect, overall diagnostic performance of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC with regard to their internal normative database was not significantly different. As both Stratus OCT and GDx VCC showed only moderate sensitivity, these imaging devices may not substitute red-free fundus photography in clinical practice of glaucoma diagnosis.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomographyko_KR
dc.subjectretinal nerve fiber layer defectko_KR
dc.subjectspecificityko_KR
dc.subjectscanning laser polarimetryko_KR
dc.subjectsensitivityko_KR
dc.titleComparison of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry for Detection of Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defectsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor유영철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박기호-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA-
dc.description.citedreferenceWindisch BK, 2009, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V93, P225, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2008.141945-
dc.description.citedreferenceBudenz DL, 2007, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V114, P1046, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.046-
dc.description.citedreferenceBrusini P, 2006, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V84, P650, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00747.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceHwang JM, 2006, J GLAUCOMA, V15, P223-
dc.description.citedreferenceKanamori A, 2006, GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP, V244, P58, DOI 10.1007/s00417-005-0029-0-
dc.description.citedreferenceJeoung JW, 2005, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V112, P2157, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.07.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceLeung CKS, 2005, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V46, P3214, DOI 10.1167/iovs.05-0294-
dc.description.citedreferenceBudenz DL, 2005, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V112, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.039-
dc.description.citedreferenceReus NJ, 2004, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V111, P1860, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.024-
dc.description.citedreferenceMedeiros FA, 2004, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V122, P827-
dc.description.citedreferenceMedeiros FA, 2003, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V44, P2606, DOI 10.1167/iovs.02-0814-
dc.description.citedreferenceGuedes V, 2003, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V110, P177-
dc.description.citedreferenceMok KH, 2002, J GLAUCOMA, V11, P392, DOI 10.1097/01.IJG.0000030429.23569.3E-
dc.description.citedreferenceWeinreb RN, 2002, J GLAUCOMA, V11, P378, DOI 10.1097/01.IJG.0000030693.08305.6D-
dc.description.citedreferenceSoliman MAE, 2002, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V133, P187-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchuman JS, 1996, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V103, P1889-
dc.description.citedreferenceNiessen AGJE, 1996, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V121, P484-
dc.description.citedreferenceWEINREB RN, 1995, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V119, P627-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHUMAN JS, 1995, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V113, P586-
dc.description.citedreferenceDREHER AW, 1992, APPL OPTICS, V31, P3730, DOI 10.1364/AO.31.003730-
dc.description.citedreferenceHUANG D, 1991, SCIENCE, V254, P1178-
dc.description.citedreferenceSOMMER A, 1991, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V109, P77-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1986, T AM OPHTHAL SOC, V84, P920-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1982, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V100, P135-
dc.description.citedreferenceQUIGLEY HA, 1981, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V99, P635-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share