Publications

Detailed Information

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: experience at Korea`s National Cancer Center

Cited 20 time in Web of Science Cited 26 time in Scopus
Authors

Jeong, Woon Kyung; Park, Ji Won; Choi, Hyo Seong; Chang, Hee Jin; Jeong, Seung-Yong

Issue Date
2009-11
Publisher
SPRINGER
Citation
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES; Vol.23 11; 2575-2579
Keywords
Local excisionRectal tumorTransanal endoscopic microsurgery
Abstract
Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive alternative to transanal excision, enabling complete local excision of selected benign or malignant rectal tumors. This study aimed to determine the surgical and oncologic results for rectal tumors excised by TEM. Methods From November 2001 to October 2007, 45 patients underwent TEM for excision of adenoma (13 patients), carcinoid tumor (6 patients), and carcinoma (26 patients). The patients included 27 men and 18 women with a median age of 52 years (range, 22-72 years). Results The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 7 cm (range, 3-15 cm), and the median tumor size was 17 mm (range, 2-60 mm). There was no procedure-related morbidity or mortality. However, one patient with rectal carcinoma died of lung cancer during the follow-up period. Of 13 patients with adenomas, I patient (7.7%, 1/13) experienced local recurrence 5 months after Surgery. No recurrence occurred for six patients with carcinoid tumors. Histologic examination of the carcinomas showed pathologic tumor (pT) stage 0 (ypT0) in 2 patients, pT 1 in 17 patients (including ypT1 in I patient), pT2 in 6 patients, and pT3 in 1 patient. Immediate salvage surgery was performed for five patients (19%, 5/26). During a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 5-72 months), one patient (3.8%, 1/26) experienced local recurrence. The overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates for patients with carcinoma were 96.2% and 88.5%. respectively. Conclusions The TEM procedure is a safe and appropriate surgical treatment option for benign rectal tumors. With strict patient selection, it is oncologically safe for early-stage rectal carcinomas.
ISSN
0930-2794
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/77918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0466-7
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share