Publications

Detailed Information

Efficacy of Computer-Aided Detection System and Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projection Technique in the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Patients With Resected Metastases

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Eun-Ah-
dc.contributor.authorGoo, Jin Mo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Won-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Chang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ho Yun-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Jung-Gi-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang Min-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyun Ju-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-02T01:38:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-02T01:38:01Z-
dc.date.issued2009-02-
dc.identifier.citationINVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY; Vol.44(2); 105-113ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0020-9996-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78040-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the efficacy of the computer-aided detection (CAD) system and thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) technique in the detection of pulmonary nodules at multidetector computed tomography (CT) in patients who underwent metastatectomy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and patients` informed consent was waived. Forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary metastatectomy were enrolled. Four chest radiologists analyzed preoperative 1-mm section CT images and recorded the locus of each nodule candidate. Afterward, they reevaluated the images once using CAD software and once with thin-slab MIP given the results of 1-mm section CT alone. The reference standard for nodule presence was established by a consensus panel and pathologic records for malignant nodules. Results: A total of 514 nodules were identified by a consensus panel. Of 212 nodules surgically removed, 121 nodules were malignant. The sensitivity of each observer in detecting malignant nodules with thin-section CT scans alone was 91%, 88%, 87%, and 86% for observers A- to D, respectively. With CAD, sensitivity increased significantly to 95%, 95%, 94%, and 95% (P<0.05 for observer B-D), and using MIP increased to 94%, 96%, 91%, and 92% (P<0.05 for observer B-D), respectively. There were no significant differences in sensitivity between CAD and MIP for the detection of malignant nodules. The average number of false-positive findings per patient was 0.8 with thin-section CT alone, 1.1 with CAD, and 1.4 with MIP. Conclusions: In candidates for metastatectomy, reading with the aid of either CAD or MIP significantly improved the detection of malignant nodules compared with using thin-section CT alone.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectmultislice computed tomographyko_KR
dc.subjectcomputer-aided detectionko_KR
dc.subjectmetastatectomyko_KR
dc.subjectpulmonary nodulesko_KR
dc.subjectmaximum intensity projectionko_KR
dc.titleEfficacy of Computer-Aided Detection System and Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projection Technique in the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Patients With Resected Metastasesko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박은아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구진모-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강창현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이현주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이창현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박창민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이호윤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임정기-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RLI.0b013e318190fcfc-
dc.citation.journaltitleINVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceGoo JM, 2008, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V32, P570-
dc.description.citedreferenceBley TA, 2008, INVEST RADIOL, V43, P343-
dc.description.citedreferenceJankowski A, 2007, EUR RADIOL, V17, P3148, DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0727-6-
dc.description.citedreferencePeloschek P, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V243, P561, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2432052052-
dc.description.citedreferencePort JL, 2007, ANN THORAC SURG, V83, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.030-
dc.description.citedreferenceDas M, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V241, P564, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2412051139-
dc.description.citedreferenceYuan R, 2006, AM J ROENTGENOL, V186, P1280, DOI 10.2214/AJR.04.1969-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee SE, 2006, UROL INT, V76, P256, DOI 10.1159/000091630-
dc.description.citedreferenceGoo JM, 2005, KOREAN J RADIOL, V6, P62-
dc.description.citedreferenceRubin GD, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V234, P274, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2341040589-
dc.description.citedreferenceWormanns D, 2005, EUR RADIOL, V15, P14, DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2527-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceKONDO H, 2005, INT J CLIN ONCOL, V10, P81-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JW, 2004, INVEST RADIOL, V39, P649-
dc.description.citedreferenceArmato SG, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V232, P739, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2323032035-
dc.description.citedreferenceGwak GY, 2004, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V51, P1428-
dc.description.citedreferenceAwai K, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V230, P347, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2302030049-
dc.description.citedreferenceFischbach F, 2003, EUR RADIOL, V13, P2378, DOI 10.1007/s00330-003-1915-7-
dc.description.citedreferenceGoo JM, 2003, KOREAN J RADIOL, V4, P211-
dc.description.citedreferencePak H, 2003, J SURG ONCOL, V82, P10, DOI 10.1002/jso.10189-
dc.description.citedreferenceArmato SG, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V225, P685, DOI [10.1148/radiol.2253011376, 10.1148/radiol.2553011376]-
dc.description.citedreferenceBattafarano RJ, 2002, ANN THORAC SURG, V74, P988-
dc.description.citedreferencePutnam JB, 2002, ANN THORAC SURG, V74, P993-
dc.description.citedreferenceGruden JF, 2002, AM J ROENTGENOL, V179, P149-
dc.description.citedreferenceBelal A, 2001, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V42, P835-
dc.description.citedreferenceProtopapas AD, 2001, ANN THORAC SURG, V72, P1906-
dc.description.citedreferenceEibel R, 2001, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V173, P815-
dc.description.citedreferenceDavidson RS, 2001, SURG ONCOL, V10, P35-
dc.description.citedreferenceDiederich S, 2001, EUR RADIOL, V11, P1345-
dc.description.citedreferenceDOWNEY RJ, 1999, SURG ONCOL CLIN N AM, V8, P341-
dc.description.citedreferenceDiederich S, 1999, EUR RADIOL, V9, P281-
dc.description.citedreferenceWatanabe M, 1998, J LAPAROENDOSC ADV A, V8, P195-
dc.description.citedreferenceCoakley FV, 1998, BRIT J RADIOL, V71, P135-
dc.description.citedreferenceSimpson R, 1997, AUST NZ J SURG, V67, P717-
dc.description.citedreferenceBhalla M, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V200, P341-
dc.description.citedreferenceRemyJardin M, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V200, P333-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAPEL S, 1993, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V17, P832-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAIDICH DP, 1993, J THORAC IMAG, V8, P291-
dc.description.citedreferenceRIS HB, 1991, THORAC CARDIOV SURG, V39, P224-
dc.description.tc4-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share