Publications

Detailed Information

Magnetic resonance pancreatography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jin-Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Min-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Min Woo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Soo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ji Yang-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byung Ihn-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Joon Koo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sun Young-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-02T06:59:06Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-02T06:59:06Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY; Vol.19 9; 2163-2170ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78106-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose was to compare two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP) with 3D MRP to evaluate intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Thirty-four patients (22 men, 12 women; age range, 45-80 years) with IPMN (n = 40) were examined with MRP on 2D and 3D sequences. Two readers independently reviewed the images to assess the overall image quality, artifacts, lesion location, communication with main pancreatic duct, and potential for malignancy. The readers assigned their confidence level (1-5) for predicting ductal communication of the lesion. The results of MRP were compared with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and surgical and histopathologic findings. Studies obtained with 3D MRP were of significantly higher technical quality than those obtained with 2D MRP. Although 3D MRP showed higher area under the ROC curve (Az) values for predicting ductal communication of the lesion, there was no statistical significance between Az values of 2D and 3D MRP (Az for 2D = 0.821, 0.864 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, and Az for 3D= 0.964, 0.921). Accuracies for discriminating benign from malignant lesions were 70 and 67.5% (reader 1 and 2, respectively, for 2D) and 62.5 and 80.1% (3D). 3D MRP showed superior image quality to that of 2D MRP but did not increase the diagnostic accuracy for predicting ductal communication of the lesion.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a faculty
research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2008
(0226).
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSPRINGERko_KR
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance pancreatographyko_KR
dc.subjectIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmko_KR
dc.subjectPancreasko_KR
dc.titleMagnetic resonance pancreatography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreasko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최진영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이민우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김수진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최선영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김지양-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한준구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최병인-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-009-1391-9-
dc.citation.journaltitleEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceOgawa H, 2008, RADIOLOGY, V248, P876, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2482071578-
dc.description.citedreferenceLim JS, 2008, AM J ROENTGENOL, V191, P537, DOI 10.2214/AJR.07.3162-
dc.description.citedreferenceSong SJ, 2007, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V26, P86, DOI 10.1002/jmri.21001-
dc.description.citedreferenceGoh BKP, 2007, AM J SURG, V193, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.07.019-
dc.description.citedreferenceMcGrath KM, 2007, GASTROENTEROL CLIN N, V36, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.gtc.2007.03.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCGRATH KM, 2007, GASTROENTEROL CLIN N, V36, pR9-
dc.description.citedreferenceZhang JB, 2006, AM J ROENTGENOL, V187, P1564, DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.1032-
dc.description.citedreferenceHoeffel C, 2006, RADIOGRAPHICS, V26, P1603, DOI 10.1148/rg.266055730-
dc.description.citedreferenceAsbach P, 2006, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V24, P1095, DOI 10.1002/jmri.20735-
dc.description.citedreferenceKawamoto S, 2006, AM J ROENTGENOL, V186, P687, DOI 10.2214/AJR.04.1820-
dc.description.citedreferenceSahani DV, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V238, P560, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2382041463-
dc.description.citedreferenceSodickson A, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V238, P549, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2382032065-
dc.description.citedreferenceSahani DV, 2005, RADIOGRAPHICS, V25, P1471, DOI 10.1148/rg.256045161-
dc.description.citedreferenceKlimstra DS, 2005, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V22, P318, DOI 10.1053/j.semdp.2006.04.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceLim SJ, 2005, SURGERY, V138, P672, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.033-
dc.description.citedreferenceWalsh RM, 2005, SURGERY, V138, P679-
dc.description.citedreferenceKlessen C, 2005, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V21, P576, DOI 10.1002/jmri.20293-
dc.description.citedreferenceCrewson PE, 2005, AM J ROENTGENOL, V184, P1391-
dc.description.citedreferencePilleul F, 2005, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V21, P237, DOI 10.1002/jmri.20254-
dc.description.citedreferenceBaba T, 2004, PANCREAS, V29, P212-
dc.description.citedreferenceSpinelli KS, 2004, ANN SURG, V239, P651, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000124299.57430.ce-
dc.description.citedreferenceTanaka M, 2004, PANCREAS, V28, P282-
dc.description.citedreferenceSPINELLI KS, 2004, ANN SURG, V239, P657-
dc.description.citedreferenceCohen-Scali F, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V228, P727, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2283020973-
dc.description.citedreferenceWiesenauer CA, 2003, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V138, P610-
dc.description.citedreferenceWIESENAUER CA, 2003, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V138, P617-
dc.description.citedreferenceProcacci C, 2001, EUR RADIOL, V11, P1939-
dc.description.citedreferenceTaouli B, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V217, P757-
dc.description.citedreferenceIrie H, 2000, AM J ROENTGENOL, V174, P1403-
dc.description.citedreferenceAdsay NV, 2000, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V17, P16-
dc.description.citedreferenceSUGIYAMA M, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P156-
dc.description.tc4-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share