Publications

Detailed Information

Magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses of bone scan abnormalities in breast cancer patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dae Sik-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Ja-Young-
dc.contributor.authorPaeng, Jin Chul-
dc.contributor.authorJun, Woo Sun-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Heung Sik-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Na Ra-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-02T07:10:43Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-02T07:10:43Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-
dc.identifier.citationNUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS; Vol.30 9; 736-741ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0143-3636-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78108-
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate the type of MR imaging diagnosis that corresponded to spinal lesions detected on a bone scan according to the number of lesions in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed spinal MR images of 134 patients with breast cancer whose bone scans showed one or more spinal hot uptakes. The patients were grouped according to the number of spinal lesions detected on the bone scan: one or two lesions versus multiple (more than two) lesions. By using MR imaging, we determined the etiology of the spinal lesions in terms of being either benign or malignant. If the lesions were benign, we further categorized them into several specific pathologies. Results Sixty-four (48%) of 134 patients had one or two spinal lesions as seen on a bone scan. On MR imaging, 45 (70%) of the 64 lesions had benign pathologies, whereas 19 lesions (30%) were malignant. The benign pathologies in the 45 patients included facet arthrosis in 20 patients (44%), discovertebral degeneration in 12 patients (27%), compression fractures in eight patients (18%), and Schmorl`s nodes in five patients (11%). Seventy (52%) of 134 patients had multiple spinal lesions as seen on the bone scan, and MR imaging revealed multiple bone metastases in 67 patients (96%) and facet arthrosis in three patients (4%). Conclusion One or two spinal lesions seen on a bone scan in breast cancer patients are more likely to be benign pathologies such as facet arthrosis, discovertebral degeneration, compression fracture or Schmorl`s node on MR imaging. Nucl Med Commun 30:736-741 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectbone scintigraphyko_KR
dc.subjectbreast neoplasmko_KR
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingko_KR
dc.subjectspineko_KR
dc.titleMagnetic resonance imaging diagnoses of bone scan abnormalities in breast cancer patientsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김대식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor홍성환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최자영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor팽진철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김나라-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전우선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강흥식-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832ed375-
dc.citation.journaltitleNUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim CK, 2008, CLIN NUCL MED, V33, P251-
dc.description.citedreferenceWu HTH, 2006, SKELETAL RADIOL, V35, P212, DOI 10.1007/s00256-005-0068-y-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim DW, 2005, CLIN NUCL MED, V30, P593-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAKANISHI K, 2005, MAGN RESON MED SCI, V4, P11-
dc.description.citedreferenceMentzel HJ, 2004, EUR RADIOL, V14, P2297, DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2390-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceShackleton M, 2004, INTERN MED J, V34, P615-
dc.description.citedreferenceMaffioli L, 2004, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V31, pS143-
dc.description.citedreferenceYamaguchi T, 2003, SPINE, V28, pE503-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen HHW, 2003, NUCL MED COMMUN, V24, P1167, DOI 10.1097/01.mnm.0000101607.64255.4a-
dc.description.citedreferenceNiitsu M, 2003, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V27, P469-
dc.description.citedreferenceRESNICK D, 2002, DIAGNOSIS BONE JOINT, P1430-
dc.description.citedreferenceBaudrez V, 2001, SKELETAL RADIOL, V30, P442-
dc.description.citedreferenceDaldrup-Link HE, 2001, AM J ROENTGENOL, V177, P229-
dc.description.citedreferenceReinartz P, 2000, EUR J NUCL MED, V27, P721-
dc.description.citedreferenceWeishaupt D, 1999, SKELETAL RADIOL, V28, P215-
dc.description.citedreferenceSeymour R, 1998, CLIN RADIOL, V53, P363-
dc.description.citedreferenceStabler A, 1997, AM J ROENTGENOL, V168, P933-
dc.description.citedreferenceCarroll KW, 1997, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V7, P394-
dc.description.citedreferenceCuenod CA, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V199, P541-
dc.description.citedreferenceTAKAHASHI K, 1994, J SPINAL DISORD, V7, P77-
dc.description.citedreferenceJACOBSON AF, 1990, J NUCL MED, V31, P387-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCLAIN R, 1990, SPINE, V15, P247-
dc.description.citedreferenceBOXER DI, 1989, J NUCL MED, V30, P1318-
dc.description.citedreferenceKAGEN S, 1988, CLIN NUCL MED, V13, P615-
dc.description.citedreferenceMODIC MT, 1988, RADIOLOGY, V168, P177-
dc.description.citedreferenceMODIC MT, 1988, RADIOLOGY, V166, P193-
dc.description.citedreferenceRESNICK D, 1978, RADIOLOGY, V126, P57-
dc.description.citedreferenceHOPKINS GB, 1973, CALIF MED, V119, P10-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share