Publications

Detailed Information

ANALYSIS OF ELASTOGRAPHIC AND B-MODE FEATURES AT SONOELASTOGRAPHY FOR BREAST TUMOR CLASSIFICATION

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Woo Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chiun-Sheng-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Wei-Chih-
dc.contributor.authorTakada, Etsuo-
dc.contributor.authorJoe, Juliwati-
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Masayuki-
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Michiko-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ruey-Feng-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-02T08:13:48Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-02T08:13:48Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.citationULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY; Vol.35 11; 1794-1802ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0301-5629-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78126-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of neural network analysis of elastographic features at sonoelastography for the classification of biopsy-proved benign and malignant breast tumors. Sonoelastography of 181 solid breast masses (113 benign and 68 malignant tumors) was performed for 181 patients (mean age, 47 years; range, 24-75 years). After the manual segmentation of the tumors, five elastographic features (strain difference, strain ratio, mean, median and mode) and six B-mode features (orientation, undulation, angularity, average gradient, gradient variance and intensity variance) were computed. A neural network was used to classify tumors by the use of these features. The Student`s t test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for statistical analysis. Area under ROC curve (Az) values of the three elastographic features mean (0.87), median (0.86) and mode (0.83)-were significantly higher than the Az values for the six B-mode features (0.54-0.69) (p < 0.01). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Az of the neural network for the classification of solid breast tumors were 86.2% (156/181), 83.8% (57/68), 87.6% (99/113) and 0.84 for the elastographic features, respectively, and 82.3% (149/181), 70.6% (48/68), 89.4% (101/113) and 0.78 for the B-mode features, respectively, and 90.6% (164/181), 95.6% (65/68), 87.6% (99/113) and 0.92 for the combination of the elastographic and B-mode features, respectively. We conclude that sonoelastographic images and neural network analysis of features has the potential to increase the accuracy of the use of ultrasound for the classification of benign and malignant breast tumors. (E-mail: rfchang@csie.ntu.edu.tw) (C) 2009 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a grant from the
National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC96-2221-
E-002-268-MY3) and a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R
and D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic
of Korea (A070001).
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCko_KR
dc.subjectBreast tumorko_KR
dc.subjectBI-RADSko_KR
dc.subjectNeural networkko_KR
dc.subjectB-mode ultrasoundko_KR
dc.subjectElastographyko_KR
dc.titleANALYSIS OF ELASTOGRAPHIC AND B-MODE FEATURES AT SONOELASTOGRAPHY FOR BREAST TUMOR CLASSIFICATIONko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문우경-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.1094-
dc.citation.journaltitleULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho N, 2009, EUR RADIOL, V19, P1621, DOI 10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4-
dc.description.citedreferenceMuller M, 2009, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V35, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.08.018-
dc.description.citedreferenceScaperrotta G, 2008, EUR RADIOL, V18, P2381, DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1032-8-
dc.description.citedreferenceZhi H, 2008, ACAD RADIOL, V15, P1347, DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceTanter M, 2008, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V34, P1373, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho N, 2008, KOREAN J RADIOL, V9, P111, DOI 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.2.111-
dc.description.citedreferenceGONZALEZ RC, 2008, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES-
dc.description.citedreferenceBooi RC, 2008, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V34, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.07.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurnside ES, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V245, P401, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2452061805-
dc.description.citedreferenceShen WC, 2007, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V33, P1688, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceShen WC, 2007, ACAD RADIOL, V14, P928, DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.016-
dc.description.citedreferenceSahiner B, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V242, P716, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2423051464-
dc.description.citedreferenceItoh A, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V239, P341, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2391041676-
dc.description.citedreferenceRegner DM, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V238, P425, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2381041336-
dc.description.citedreferenceSVENSSON WE, 2006, ULTRASOUND MED BI S1, V32, P173-
dc.description.citedreferenceMoon WK, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V236, P458, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2362041095-
dc.description.citedreferenceHong AS, 2005, AM J ROENTGENOL, V184, P1260-
dc.description.citedreferenceSVENSSON WE, 2005, P 4 INT C ULTR MEAS, P87-
dc.description.citedreferenceJoo S, 2004, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V23, P1292, DOI 10.1109/TMI.2004.834617-
dc.description.citedreferenceHorsch K, 2004, ACAD RADIOL, V11, P272, DOI 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00719-0-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen CM, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V226, P504, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2262011843-
dc.description.citedreference*AM COLL RAD, 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY-
dc.description.citedreferenceHall TJ, 2003, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V29, P427, DOI 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00733-0-
dc.description.citedreferenceSHAPIRO LG, 2001, COMPUTER VISION-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAYKIN S, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS COMP-
dc.description.citedreferenceGarra BS, 1997, RADIOLOGY, V202, P79-
dc.description.citedreferenceOPHIR J, 1991, ULTRASONIC IMAGING, V13, P111-
dc.description.tc9-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share