Publications

Detailed Information

Viability of Fat Cells Over Time After Syringe Suction Lipectomy The Effects of Cryopreservation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSon, Daegu-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Jaehoon-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Taehyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Junhyung-
dc.contributor.authorHa, Seongyun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyungho-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kihwan-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-03T06:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-03T06:27:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-
dc.identifier.citationANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY; Vol.65 3; 354-360ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0148-7043-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78270-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the late decline in viability of fat cells over time for fat tissue stored at -15 degrees C and -70 degrees C after harvest from abdominal liposuction. A total of 16 females were recruited for this study. The viability of fat cell specimens was measured after freezing for 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 days. A number of viable mature adipocytes were evaluated by fluorescence microscopy after staining with fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide. The glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity was measured in lipoaspirates before digestion and the XTT reduction assay was performed. In addition, the XTT reduction assay was also performed on isolated lipocytes and preadipocytes. The viability of mature adipocytes was very low for both the -15 degrees C and -70 degrees C samples after 1 day of freezing (13.3% +/- 7.4% and 12.6% +/- 6.3%, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the samples stored at the 2 temperatures. The GPDH activity of the lipoaspirates frozen, for 1 day, at -15 degrees C and -70 degrees C was 25.1% +/- 10% and 28.7% +/- 11%, respectively. For the XTT test, the fractional enzyme activity of the lipoaspirates frozen, for 1 day, at -15 degrees C and -70 degrees C was 30.0% +/- 10.9% and 36.1% +/- 12.3%, respectively. In addition, the adipocytes had low activity from day one: 15.4% +/- 7.2% at -15 degrees C and 11.5% +/- 5.6% at -70 degrees C. Furthermore, the preadipocytes had a low activity of 8.0% +/- 6.0% at -15 degrees C and 8.6% +/- 3.8% at -70 degrees C. At 8 weeks, there were few viable mature adipocytes and the activity of the cells was very low by XTT and GPDH testing. The results of this study showed that the viability of adipocytes declined rapidly after frozen storage for 1 day at both -15 degrees C and -70 degrees C, and decreased gradually in storage after 8 weeks; at which time only approximately 5% of the fat cells were alive. These findings suggest that the present fat preservation storage techniques using a -15 degrees C freezer or a -70 degrees C deep freezer are both inadequate to maintain the viability of fat cells.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectfat viabilityko_KR
dc.subjectcryopreservationko_KR
dc.subjectfat graftko_KR
dc.titleViability of Fat Cells Over Time After Syringe Suction Lipectomy The Effects of Cryopreservationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor손대구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오재훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최태현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김전형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한기환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor하성윤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이경호-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181bb49b8-
dc.citation.journaltitleANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY-
dc.description.citedreferenceCui XD, 2007, CRYOBIOLOGY, V55, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.08.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceMatsumoto D, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, P1510, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000288015.70922.e4-
dc.description.citedreferenceLi Y, 2006, CRYOBIOLOGY, V53, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2006.06.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceTholpady SS, 2006, CLIN PLAST SURG, V33, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2005.08.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceWolter TP, 2005, ANN PLAS SURG, V55, P408, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000181345.56084.7d-
dc.description.citedreferencePu LLQ, 2005, ANN PLAS SURG, V54, P288, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000153147.23088.cb-
dc.description.citedreferenceLeong DTW, 2005, J DERMATOL SCI, V37, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2004.11.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceMacRae JW, 2004, ANN PLAS SURG, V52, P281, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000110559.58945.2c-
dc.description.citedreferenceRohrich RJ, 2004, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V113, P391-
dc.description.citedreferenceRamsay TG, 2003, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V136, P245, DOI 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00261-0-
dc.description.citedreferenceTchoukalova YD, 2003, J LIPID RES, V44, P1795, DOI 10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200-
dc.description.citedreferenceBoschert MT, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P761-
dc.description.citedreferenceShiffman MA, 2001, DERMATOL SURG, V27, P819-
dc.description.citedreferenceZuk PA, 2001, TISSUE ENG, V7, P211-
dc.description.citedreferencevon Heimburg D, 2001, BIOMATERIALS, V22, P429-
dc.description.citedreferenceSommer B, 2000, DERMATOL SURG, V26, P1159-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiu J, 2000, BIOL REPROD, V63, P1303-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHULLERPETROVI.S, 1997, FACIAL PLAST SURG, V13, P119-
dc.description.citedreferenceGuerrerosantos J, 1996, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V20, P403-
dc.description.citedreferencePereira LH, 1996, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V20, P409-
dc.description.citedreferenceMOORE JH, 1995, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V19, P335-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAMBLEY RM, 1992, J DERMATOL SURG ONC, V18, P963-
dc.description.citedreferenceMAZUR P, 1990, CELL BIOPHYS, V17, P53-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCARBOROUGH DA, 1990, J DERMATOL SURG ONC, V16, P651-
dc.description.citedreferenceRAMSAY TG, 1987, J ANIM SCI, V64, P735-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share