Publications

Detailed Information

(18)F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: consideration of lymph node calcification and distribution pattern to improve specificity

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Won-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Bom Sahn-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Soo-
dc.contributor.authorChung, June-Key-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Soonhag-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Won Jun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Myung Chul-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-03T07:19:38Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-03T07:19:38Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING; Vol.36 11; 1794-1802ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1619-7070-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78284-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a region with a high prevalence of granulomatous disease. Between March 2004 and February 2006, all patients with NSCLC underwent FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced thoracic CT, and subsequent surgical resection. PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT images of 182 patients (126 men and 56 women; mean age 60.7 years) with NSCLC were acquired. Mediastinal node staging was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Surgical and histological findings served as the reference standard. A total of 182 patients with 778 mediastinal node stations were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT were 36% and 80% on a per-patient basis and 23% and 92% on a per-node station basis. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 81% and 73% on a per-patient basis and 75% and 85% on a per-node station basis. After lymph nodes with calcification and bilateral hilar distribution were considered benign, sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 75% and 89% on a per-patient basis and 66% and 96% on a per-node station basis. This prospective study suggests that FDG PET/CT can more accurately stage mediastinal lymph nodes than CT. Considering lymph node calcification and distribution pattern could improve specificity at the cost of a decrease in sensitivity.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSPRINGERko_KR
dc.subjectLung cancerko_KR
dc.subjectPositron emission tomography (PET)ko_KR
dc.subject(18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)ko_KR
dc.subjectStagingko_KR
dc.title(18)F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: consideration of lymph node calcification and distribution pattern to improve specificityko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김봄산-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이동수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정준기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이명철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김순학-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강원준-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00259-009-1155-4-
dc.citation.journaltitleEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING-
dc.description.citedreferenceYen RF, 2008, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V35, P1305, DOI 10.1007/s00259-008-0733-1-
dc.description.citedreferenceBayman NA, 2008, CLIN LUNG CANCER, V9, P92-
dc.description.citedreferenceTIEU BH, 2008, THORAC SURG CLIN, V18, P403-
dc.description.citedreferenceHWANGBO B, 2008, CHEST-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim YK, 2007, CANCER, V109, P1068, DOI 10.1002/cncr.22518-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim BT, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V241, P501, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2412051173-
dc.description.citedreferenceShim SS, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V236, P1011, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2363041310-
dc.description.citedreferenceCerfolio RJ, 2004, ANN THORAC SURG, V78, P1017, DOI 10.1016/j.athorascur.2004.02.067-
dc.description.citedreferenceDetterbeck FC, 2004, CHEST, V125, P2300-
dc.description.citedreferenceRohren EM, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V231, P305, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2312021185-
dc.description.citedreferenceVerhagen AFT, 2004, LUNG CANCER-J IASLC, V44, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.11.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceHalter G, 2004, THORAC CARDIOV SURG, V52, P96, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-817844-
dc.description.citedreferenceKang WJ, 2004, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V31, P202, DOI 10.1007/s00259-003-1368-x-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchrevens L, 2004, ONCOLOGIST, V9, P633-
dc.description.citedreferenceCerfolio RJ, 2003, ANN THORAC SURG, V76, P861-
dc.description.citedreferenceLardinois D, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P2500-
dc.description.citedreferenceSILVESTRI GA, 2003, CHEST, V123, P147-
dc.description.citedreferenceTOLOZA EM, 2003, CHEST, V123, P157-
dc.description.citedreferenceGREENE FL, 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD-
dc.description.citedreferenceFischer BMB, 2001, LANCET ONCOL, V2, P659-
dc.description.citedreferenceKamiyoshihara M, 2001, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V42, P119-
dc.description.citedreferencePieterman RM, 2000, NEW ENGL J MED, V343, P254-
dc.description.citedreferenceFarrell MA, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P886-
dc.description.citedreferenceKo JP, 2000, AM J ROENTGENOL, V174, P775-
dc.description.citedreferenceHong YP, 1998, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V2, P27-
dc.description.citedreferenceGdeedo A, 1997, EUR RESPIR J, V10, P1547-
dc.description.citedreferenceMountain CF, 1997, CHEST, V111, P1710-
dc.description.citedreferenceMountain CF, 1997, CHEST, V111, P1718-
dc.description.citedreferenceHoh CK, 1997, SEMIN NUCL MED, V27, P94-
dc.description.citedreferenceTakizawa T, 1997, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V113, P248-
dc.description.citedreferenceStrauss LG, 1996, EUR J NUCL MED, V23, P1409-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCLOUD TC, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V182, P319-
dc.description.tc3-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share