Publications

Detailed Information

Chemoembolization of the Left Inferior Phrenic Artery in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 9-Year Single-Center Experience

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyo-Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Jin Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Won Hwa-
dc.contributor.authorAn, Sangbu-
dc.contributor.authorJae, Hwan Jun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jae Hyung-
dc.contributor.authorSeong, Nak Jong-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-04T05:19:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-04T05:19:53Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-
dc.identifier.citationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY; Vol.194 4; 1124-1130ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78408-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the radiologic findings and imaging response of hepatocellular carcinoma supplied by the left inferior phrenic artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 2000 through December 2008, chemoembolization of the left inferior phrenic artery was performed on 152 patients (123 men, 29 women; mean age, 55.8 years) with hepatocellular carcinoma. The CT scans and digital subtraction angiograms of these patients were retrospectively reviewed in consensus by two investigators, who evaluated tumor location, tumor-feeding vessels, origin of the left inferior phrenic artery, technical success of chemoembolization, complications, and tumor response. Tumor response was assessed on the basis of the criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver. RESULTS. Tumors supplied by the left inferior phrenic artery were located in Couinaud segment 2/3 (n = 100), segment 4 (n = 45), and other segments (n = 7). The most common tumor-feeding vessel was the anteromedial limb of the left inferior phrenic artery (n = 82) followed by the lateral limb (n = 40) and the anterior limb (n = 30). Selective chemoembolization via the left inferior phrenic artery was achieved in 58 of the patients (38%). Complete or partial response as detected on first follow-up CT images (mean follow-up time, 2.5 months) was achieved by 30 patients. In 33 patients in whom the tumor was supplied exclusively by the left inferior phrenic artery, the tumor response was more favorable in patients who underwent selective than in those who underwent nonselective chemoembolization via the left inferior phrenic artery (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION. Selective chemoembolization via the left inferior phrenic artery is possible and results in good response of tumors supplied exclusively by the left inferior phrenic artery.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherAMER ROENTGEN RAY SOCko_KR
dc.subjectchemoembolizationko_KR
dc.subjecthepatocellular carcinomako_KR
dc.subjectinferior phrenic arteryko_KR
dc.titleChemoembolization of the Left Inferior Phrenic Artery in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 9-Year Single-Center Experienceko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김효철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정진욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김원화-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor안상부-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor성낙종-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor재환준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박재형-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.09.3030-
dc.citation.journaltitleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HC, 2009, AM J ROENTGENOL, V193, pW288, DOI 10.2214/AJR.09.2417-
dc.description.citedreferenceHieda M, 2009, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V32, P250, DOI 10.1007/s00270-008-9434-1-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM HC, 2009, AJR, V193, P983-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HC, 2008, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V19, P1551, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HC, 2008, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V19, P1419, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiyayama S, 2007, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V18, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2006.12.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HC, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V242, P925, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2423060220-
dc.description.citedreferenceChung JW, 2006, KOREAN J RADIOL, V7, P257-
dc.description.citedreferenceIshigami K, 2006, AM J ROENTGENOL, V187, P1002, DOI 10.2214/AJR.05.1114-
dc.description.citedreferenceSong SY, 2006, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V17, P461, DOI 10.1097/01.RVI.0000202718.16416.18-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiyayama S, 2006, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V29, P39, DOI 10.1007/s00270-004-0287-y-
dc.description.citedreferenceSuh SH, 2005, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V16, P1741, DOI 10.1097/01.RVI.0000182172.00168.1B-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HC, 2005, RADIOGRAPHICS, V25, pS25, DOI 10.1148/rg.25si055508-
dc.description.citedreferenceLoukas M, 2005, CLIN ANAT, V18, P357, DOI 10.1002/ca.20112-
dc.description.citedreferenceLlovet JM, 2003, HEPATOLOGY, V37, P429, DOI 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047-
dc.description.citedreferenceGeschwind JFH, 2002, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V13, P991-
dc.description.citedreferenceBruix J, 2001, J HEPATOL, V35, P421-
dc.description.citedreferenceSEKI H, 1999, RAD MED, V17, P435-
dc.description.citedreferenceChung JW, 1998, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V9, P495-
dc.description.citedreferenceSMITH DC, 1977, RADIOLOGY, V125, P613-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOUINAUD C, 1957, FOIE ETUDES ANATOMIQ, P9-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share