Publications

Detailed Information

Real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restoration

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sun-Young-
dc.contributor.authorFerracane, Jack-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hae-Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, In-Bog-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-14T08:36:27Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-14T08:36:27Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF DENTISTRY; Vol.38, No.4, pp.343-351ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/80510-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study examined changes in the dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during restorative procedures and compared permeability after restoration among restorative materials and adhesives. Methods: A class 1 cavity was prepared and restored with either amalgam (Bestaloy), or composite (Z-250) with one of two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Scotchbond MultiPurpose: MP and Single Bond 2: SB) or one of two self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond: CE and Easy Bond: EB) on an extracted human third molar which was connected to a sub-nanoliter fluid flow measuring device (NFMD) under 20 cm water pressure. DFF was measured from the intact tooth state through the restoration procedures to 30 mm after restoration, and re-measured at 3 and 7 days post-restoration. Results: Inward flow during cavity preparation was followed by outward flow after preparation. In amalgam restoration, the outward flow changed into an inward flow during amalgam filling, which was followed by a slight outward flow after finishing. In composite restoration, MP and SB showed an inward flow and outward flow for the rinsing and drying steps, respectively. Application of a hydrophobic bonding resin in the MP and CE systems caused a decrease in the flow rate. Air-drying of solvent for the CE and EB systems caused a sudden outward flow, whereas light-curing of the adhesive and composite caused an abrupt inward flow. Conclusions: Each restorative step clearly changed the direction and the rate of the DFF during restoration, which could be well identified with NFMD. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDko_KR
dc.subjectDentinal fluid flowko_KR
dc.subjectCompositeko_KR
dc.subjectEtch-and-rinseko_KR
dc.subjectAmalgamko_KR
dc.subjectPermeabilityko_KR
dc.subjectSelf-etchko_KR
dc.titleReal-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow during amalgam and composite restorationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김선영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김혜영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이인복-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.008-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF DENTISTRY-
dc.description.tc3-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share