Publications

Detailed Information

An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Gender Differences in the Evaluation of Advertisements

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSUH, JUNG-CHAE-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-18T09:18:47Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-18T09:18:47Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-
dc.identifier.citationSeoul Journal of Business, Vol.18 No.2, pp. 3-23-
dc.identifier.issn1226-9816-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/80779-
dc.description.abstractAlthough some studies have shown gender differences in the evaluation of messages in advertisements, these differences have not been strongly supported by empirical evidence. Using a meta-analytic technique, this study analyzes the effect sizes of the existing studies on this topic to determine which factors vary the results of the studies. The results of the exploratory analysis for brand attitudes toward advertisements support both the vividness theory and the sex-role and social dominance theories. However, for purchase intentions, the results do not support both theories. Women show more purchase intentions than men in the evaluation of advertisements, regardless of the message type.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCollege of Business Administration (경영대학)-
dc.subjectGender Differences-
dc.subjectSelf vs Others-
dc.subjectVisual vs Verbal-
dc.subjectMeta-Analytic Test-
dc.subjectAdvertising-
dc.subjectBrand Attitude-
dc.subjectPurchase Intention-
dc.subjectCognitive Resource Matching-
dc.titleAn Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Gender Differences in the Evaluation of Advertisements-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서정채-
dc.citation.journaltitleSeoul Journal of Business-
dc.citation.endpage23-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages3-23-
dc.citation.startpage3-
dc.citation.volume18-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share