Publications

Detailed Information

Effect of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics on Pain Perception During Scaling by Ultrasonic or Hand Instruments: A Masked Randomized Controlled Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChung, Jae-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Sang-A-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae-Il-
dc.contributor.authorSeol, Yang-Jo-
dc.contributor.authorKu, Young-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Chong-Pyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Ki-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorRhyu, In-Chul-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yong-Moo-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-23T06:13:43Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-23T06:13:43Z-
dc.date.issued2011-02-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, Vol.82, No.2, pp.259-266ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/81041-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aims of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream on pain perception during scaling and to compare the intensities of pain provoked by hand and ultrasonic instruments. Methods: Forty subjects with chronic gingivitis or periodontitis were enrolled in the study. In this randomized, split-mouth, controlled, masked clinical trial, each of the four quadrants in subjects was randomly assigned to receive one of the following protocols: scaling with an ultrasonic scaler with or without the application of the EMLA cream or scaling with a Gracey curet with or without the application of the EMLA cream. Pain levels after each quadrant of scaling were assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to 100 mm) and verbal rating score (VRS; 0 to 4). All subjects were recalled to detect any complications after 24 hours. Results: The mean VAS and VRS when EMLA cream was applied (18.39 +/- 14.47 mm and 0.95 +/- 0.69) were significantly lower (P < 0.001 for VAS and VRS) compared to when EMLA cream was not used (26.54 +/- 16.46 mm and 1.30 +/- 0.75). The mean VAS and VRS of the ultrasonic scaler group (20.43 +/- 16.40 mm and 0.98 +/- 0.76) were significantly lower (P=0.024 for VAS; P=0.003 for VRS) than those of the Gracey curet group (24.50 +/- 15.17 mm and 1.28 +/- 0.69). None of the subjects showed adverse effects after EMLA-cream application. Conclusion: Although most patients experienced limited pain during scaling, a significant reduction of pain is achieved by using EMLA cream and ultrasonic scaler. J Periodontol 2011;82:259-266.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontologyko_KR
dc.subjectClinical trialko_KR
dc.subjectdental scalingko_KR
dc.subjectroot planingko_KR
dc.subjectpain perceptionko_KR
dc.subjectlocal anesthesiako_KR
dc.titleEffect of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics on Pain Perception During Scaling by Ultrasonic or Hand Instruments: A Masked Randomized Controlled Trialko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정재은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor고상아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태일-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor설양조-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정종평-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구기태-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류인철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이용무-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2010.090748-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share