1999년 특별검사법의 문제점과 입법적 개선
The Special Prosecutor Act of 1999 and Its Problems

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Issue Date
서울대학교 법학연구소
법학, Vol.41 No.3, pp. 199-228
특별검사제도김태정 검찰총장특별검사(Independent Counsel미합중국의 특별검사제도
I introduced the Special Prosecutor System of the U.S. and suggested my

opinion that this system is very useful and effective in the democratization

of Korea. The Special Prosecutor Act was enacted at the beginning of 1999.

However, it was limited to investigating just two cases: political corruption

involving the Chief prosecutor and a senior prosecutor's role in forcing a

strike by a labor union. This Act lasted for only 6 months.

The aim of this article is to review the problems of this Act and suggest

some ideas for improving the effectiveness of the Special Prosecutor System

in Korea.

The Special Prosecutor System is helpful in solving conflicts of interest,

keeping investigation and prosecution independent from political influence in

prosecuting higher officers, controlling the exercise of power effectively and

carrying out impeachment. The 1999 Special Prosecutor Act has several

problems. The object of the investigation is limited to the above two cases.

The special prosecutor is appointed by the President. The jurisdiction of the

prosecutor is limited. The release of investigative process is prohibited. The

investigation duration and transition is restricted to six months, which is not

sufficient for the special prosecutor to be effective. Against the

non-cooperation of the agency that coordinates and supports the

investigation, the use of force is option. An ordinary prosecutor can

participate in the special prosecutor's investigation.

We need to discuss and solve the above problems. In my opinion, the

American Special Prosecutor System will be useful in the development of

the Korean system. My suggestions for solving these problems are based on

a comparison with the U.S. system.
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) 법학법학 Volume 41, Number 1/4 (2001)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.