Browse

Kantian Theory, Nuclear Weapons, and Coercive Anti-Proliferation

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Issue Date
2013-11
Publisher
The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University
Citation
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, Vol.1 No.2, pp. 139-155
Keywords
Kantnuclear weaponsproliferationcoercionjusticecosmopolitanism
Abstract
This article examines the issue of coercively preventing states from acquiring and possessing nuclear weapons. In questioning whether such coercion is morally legitimate, I argue that Immanuel Kants (1724-1804) political theory contains important resources compared with three rival perspectives: Realpolitik, the Just War Tradition, and Deontological Pacifism. I also argue that coercive anti-proliferation measures are conditionally legitimated by three distinctive Kantian concepts: First, his concept of International Justice allows for coercion against genuinely aggressive states engaged in nuclear aspiration. Second, given the imperfections of international justice institutions, his concept of a State of Peoples—an authorized global governance body—seems to provide a better guarantee of just forms of coercive nuclear anti-proliferation. Third, supplementing the first two concepts, Kant discusses a Cosmopolitan Right to share the earths surface. This concept justifies coercive anti-proliferation when a peoples right to existence as citizens of the earth is threatened by nuclear weapons.
ISSN
2288-2693 (print)
2288-2707 (online)
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/90855
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18588/201311.000010
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Researcher Institutes (연구소, 연구원)Institute for Peace and Unification Studies (통일평화연구원)Asian Journal of Peacebuilding (AJP)Asian Journal of Peacebuilding vol.01 no.01-02 (2013)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse