Publications
Detailed Information
국제법상 인도에 반하는 죄와 이근안,수지 김 사건 : Did Mr. Lee, Keun An or Mr. Chang, Se Dong Commit the Crime against Humanity?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정인섭 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-09T23:27:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-09T23:27:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.43 No.1, pp. 159-179 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9085 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Mr. Lee, Keun An was a veteran officer in the police's antiespionage unit
and was notorious for torture master. He tortured many dissidents and suspects during interrogation. He had suddenly disappeared in December 1988 and turned himself to law-enforcement authorities after 11 year hiding. However, prosecutors could not indict most of his torture crimes, as his statutory limitations had already run out. The so-called Suzy Kim murder case in 1987 was recently found to have been fabricated as a North Korean espionage conspiracy under the initiative of Mr. Chang, Se Dong, the chief of the state intelligence agency at that time. Suzy Kim was killed by her husband, Mr. Yoon, Tae Shik in Hong Kong while arguing over money matters. Later Mr. Yoon insisted that his wife, Suzy Kim, was a North Korean female spy who had tried to kidnap him to north Korea with her North Korean colleagues. Even though the intelligence agency obtained Mr. Yoon's confession to the murder, Mr. Chang ordered that the homicide be labeled as a public security case involving a North Korean spy in consideration of political motives. Thereafter, Suzy Kims family suffered bitter and unbearable insults and agony in Korean society. Even though Mr. Chang's conspiracy was revealed, he could escape the punishment, as the statutory limitations on the charges against him have already expired. Some lawyers insisted that Mr. Lee, Kuen An and Mr. Chang, Se Dong committed the crimes against humanity in international law, and any statutory limitations in Korean domestic law should not be applied to their conducts. This article examined whether the conducts of Mr. Lee or Mr. Chang could... | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 장세동 안기부장 | - |
dc.subject | 의문사진상규명위원회 | - |
dc.subject | 이근안 고문혐의 사건 | - |
dc.subject | 김성학씨 고문사건 | - |
dc.subject | 수지 김 간첩조작 사건 | - |
dc.subject | 人道에 반하는 罪 | - |
dc.title | 국제법상 인도에 반하는 죄와 이근안,수지 김 사건 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Did Mr. Lee, Keun An or Mr. Chang, Se Dong Commit the Crime against Humanity? | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Jeong, In Seob | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 179 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 159-179 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 159 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 43 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.