Publications
Detailed Information
대법원의 근로관계 인식에 대한 조명 -민주헌정이후 시민법적 인식으로의 "회귀" 및 "지속"의 평가- : Review on the Precedents of the Supreme Court about Labor Relations -with References to Critical Decisions after the Constitutional Law of 1987 year-
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이흥재 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-10T04:53:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-10T04:53:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.43 No.3, pp. 205-228 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9116 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This Article attempts to overview the critical precedents of the Supreme Court
about labor relations after the Constitutional Law of 1987 year, and to evaluate the Supreme Court's basic legal point of view on them. The author argues that tendency of the precedents might be, in a short term, deregulation of labor protection and restriction on the right to strike. He analyzes that this trend of the Supreme Court could reflect rapid change of economic circumstances for competition and efficiency of management rather than social equity for labor protection under so called 'crisis of labor law' era. The author points out the basic reasoning of the Supreme Court as following; 1) The precedents of amending the rules of employment unfavorably to workers can legally help for employer to easily deteriorate working conditions for promoting competition and efficiency of management. 2) In order to conveniently take restructuring rather than employment stability, legal reasoning of management dismissal and procedural restrictions on dismissal could give employer flexible alternatives. 3) The precedent on validity of labor contract fixed term exceeding one year might back up for employer to hire massive temporary workers. 4) The precedent of rigid restrictions on the right to strike would restrain workers' collective action against restructuring or deteriorating working conditions by employer. The author contends that this kind of orientations of the Supreme Court would legally reflect consciousness of ruling class and competitive social circumstances in Korea nowadays. He further argues that approaches of the Supreme Court on labor relations might be considered as returning from legal principle of social law... | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 노동기본권의 실효성 보장 | - |
dc.subject | 노동법의 위기 | - |
dc.subject | 긴박한 경영상의 필요성 | - |
dc.subject | 쟁의행위의 정당성 여부 | - |
dc.title | 대법원의 근로관계 인식에 대한 조명 -민주헌정이후 시민법적 인식으로의 "회귀" 및 "지속"의 평가- | - |
dc.title.alternative | Review on the Precedents of the Supreme Court about Labor Relations -with References to Critical Decisions after the Constitutional Law of 1987 year- | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Lee, Heung Jae | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 228 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 205-228 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 205 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 43 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.