Browse

The Limits and Potential of Liberal Peacebuilding for Human Security

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Peou, Sorpong
Issue Date
2014-05
Publisher
The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University
Citation
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, Vol.2 No.1, pp. 37-60
Keywords
peacebuildingarmed conflictmicro-disarmamentdemocratizationretributive justiceeconomic development
Abstract
The overall record of peacebuilding as a post-Cold War liberal project has proved to be more positive than negative, especially in conflict termination. However, the peacebuilding agenda has had its limits in terms of progress in democratization, judicial institution-building and economic development, despite potential for greater success. Peacebuilders are more likely to succeed in transforming societies torn by armed conflict if they can avoid making the process excessively competitive. Democratization and capitalist development are already competitive processes, and the pursuit of retributive justice takes the form of judicial punishment. Together these strategies can form a recipe for competition and conflict, especially in institutionally weak states where the history of distrust among warring factions or former enemies is long and intractable.
ISSN
2288-2693 (print)
2288-2707 (online)
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/92336
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18588/201405.000018
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Researcher Institutes (연구소)Institute for Peace and Unification Studies (통일평화연구원)Asian Journal of PeacebuildingAsian Journal of Peacebuilding vol.02 no.01-02 (2014)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse