Publications

Detailed Information

Irregular -t and Regular -ed Forms of Preterit/Past Participle in BrE and AmE : Corpus-based Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, MyungHa-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-15T08:27:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-15T08:27:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014-12-
dc.identifier.citationSNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language, Vol.12, pp. 92-110-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/93739-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to investigate the difference in distribution of regular –ed and irregular –t forms of preterit and past participle based on corpus data. The main hypotheses addressed in this paper are : a) verbs with double forms(as in burnt/burned) will show distributional difference, b) there is a common ground that can be applied to all –ed/-t variants. The paper has been divided into four parts : historical change, text type, grammar, and semantic difference. The main verbs for this study are dream, dwell, leap, and smell. The details are studies with data from COCA, COHA, and BNC.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherDepartment of English Language and Literature, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectirregular verb-
dc.subjectdream-
dc.subjectdwell-
dc.subjectleap-
dc.subjectsmell-
dc.subjectpreterit-
dc.subjectpast participle-
dc.titleIrregular -t and Regular -ed Forms of Preterit/Past Participle in BrE and AmE : Corpus-based Study-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오명하-
dc.citation.journaltitleSNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language-
dc.citation.endpage110-
dc.citation.pages92-110-
dc.citation.startpage92-
dc.citation.volume12-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share