Publications
Detailed Information
Irregular -t and Regular -ed Forms of Preterit/Past Participle in BrE and AmE : Corpus-based Study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oh, MyungHa | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-15T08:27:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-15T08:27:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language, Vol.12, pp. 92-110 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/93739 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper aims to investigate the difference in distribution of regular –ed and irregular –t forms of preterit and past participle based on corpus data. The main hypotheses addressed in this paper are : a) verbs with double forms(as in burnt/burned) will show distributional difference, b) there is a common ground that can be applied to all –ed/-t variants. The paper has been divided into four parts : historical change, text type, grammar, and semantic difference. The main verbs for this study are dream, dwell, leap, and smell. The details are studies with data from COCA, COHA, and BNC. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Department of English Language and Literature, Seoul National University | - |
dc.subject | irregular verb | - |
dc.subject | dream | - |
dc.subject | dwell | - |
dc.subject | leap | - |
dc.subject | smell | - |
dc.subject | preterit | - |
dc.subject | past participle | - |
dc.title | Irregular -t and Regular -ed Forms of Preterit/Past Participle in BrE and AmE : Corpus-based Study | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 오명하 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | SNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 110 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 92-110 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 92 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.