Publications
Detailed Information
Austrian Capital Theory and Dynamic Analysis ofSchumpeter vs. Hayek
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Hong, Keehyun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-01-16 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-01-16 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1992-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Seoul Journal of Economics, Vol.5 No.2, pp. 167-192 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1225-0279 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/951 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Following the Austrian approach, both Schumpeter and Hayek view capital as advance. However, Schumpeter is more interested in the equilibrium breaking process due to technical innovation, whereas Hayek concerns about the equilibrating process toward stationary state. Schumpeter avoids applying the dynamic analysis in the usual sense to capitalist development, which is basically unstable. On the other hand, Hayek tries not only to analyze the adjustment process but also to refine the intertemporal equilibrium concept. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University | - |
| dc.subject | the theory of economic development | - |
| dc.subject | the circular flow | - |
| dc.subject | the pure theory of capital | - |
| dc.title | Austrian Capital Theory and Dynamic Analysis ofSchumpeter vs. Hayek | - |
| dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
| dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 홍기현 | - |
| dc.citation.journaltitle | Seoul Journal of Economics | - |
| dc.citation.endpage | 192 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.pages | 167-192 | - |
| dc.citation.startpage | 167 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 5 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.