Publications

Detailed Information

Can China Change Its Industrialization Path? Beyond the 2004-2005 Industrial Policy Debate in China

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLIU, Qunyi-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-30T04:18:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-30T04:18:18Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationSeoul Journal of Economics, Vol.29 No.2, pp. 213-233-
dc.identifier.issn1225-0279-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/96656-
dc.description.abstractThe chemical accident in Fujian Province in April 2015 and

frequent winter smog that often covers a large number of eastern

Chinese cities have resulted in policy debates similar to the one

held 10 years ago. The topic of these debates is, Does China need

to change its industrialization path? By reconsidering the 2004-

2005 Debate, the paper will focus on the policy content behind the

controversy of economic theories and beyond, namely, the relationship

between the theories and formation of policies in which stages of

diversification and the M-form of Chinese governance are highlights.

We conclude that China has experienced environment-forcing and

state-oriented economic development paradigm shift.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInstitute of Economic Research, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectIndustrial policy-
dc.subjectChinese economy-
dc.subjectHoffmann index-
dc.subjectM-form-
dc.titleCan China Change Its Industrialization Path? Beyond the 2004-2005 Industrial Policy Debate in China-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.citation.journaltitleSeoul Journal of Economics-
dc.citation.endpage233-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages213-233-
dc.citation.startpage213-
dc.citation.volume29-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share