Publications
Detailed Information
실업급여의 수급자격과 구성체계 -카나다와 한국의 고용보험법을 기초로 한 비교연구- : A Comparative Study on the Unemployment Benefits in Canada and Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이흥재 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.45 No.3, pp. 285-308 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9837 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This Article attempts to establish long-term goal for improvement of
Unemployment Benefits(UB) in the Korean Employment Insurance Act(KEIA) by compare the difference of UB between in the Canadian Employment Insurance Act(CEIA) and in KEIA. The author chooses statutes of CEIA and KEIA as comparative basic materials for clarifying the difference of UB. He limits the scope of comparative study to two categories of entitlement and types of UB. Firstly, the author points out the differences in two critical requirements of entitlement of UB; just cause for voluntarily leaving employment or being not misconduct for dismissal and efforts to search for suitable employment. In CEIA section 30(1) states that a claimant is disqualified when he or she quits without just cause or when he or she is fired due to his or her own misconduct, and section 50(8) requires that a claimant prove he or she is making reasonable and customary efforts to obtain suitable employment. 1) Just cause is generally defined under section 29(c) of CEIA as having regard to all the circumstances, the individual had no reasonable alternative to leaving the employment, and sections 29(c)(i)-(xiv) of CEIA specifically provide a list of the circumstances that can constitute just cause. Contrary to CEIA, in KEIA there is no general definition provision of just cause and a specific list of it. 2) Misconduct is not defined in CEIA and KEIA, therefore the word must be commonly given its meaning by legal interpretation. 3) In KEIA there is no counterpart of suitable employment of CEIA. Secondly, he also analyses the differences in the structure and the types of... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 발전기금(정석기금)의 일부를 지원 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 고용보험법 | - |
dc.subject | 실업급여의 구성체계 | - |
dc.subject | 법사회학적 접근 | - |
dc.subject | 실업급여의 수급자격 | - |
dc.subject | 귀책행위(비행)의 정도 | - |
dc.title | 실업급여의 수급자격과 구성체계 -카나다와 한국의 고용보험법을 기초로 한 비교연구- | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Comparative Study on the Unemployment Benefits in Canada and Korea | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Lee, Heung Jae | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 308 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 285-308 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 285 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 45 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.