Publications
Detailed Information
내사종결처분의 법적 성질 : An Analysis on a Closing Decision of an Interim Investigation Case
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 신동운 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.45 No.3, pp. 309-331 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9838 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A closing decision of an interim investigation case refers to the final decision
by which a case is accepted as an interim investigation before the case is formally filed as a criminal case. The prosecutor's office deals with the petition, appeal, letter of information, and some cases complaint by a crime victim or third party which are considered to be insufficient to make the case as the cases of interim investigation. Since the closing decision of an interim investigation case is becoming more frequent, even the lay-persons are becoming familiar with the term interim investigation or a suspect under an interim investigation. The problem is that the term interim investigation or a closing decision of an interim investigation case is not stipulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. The term is based on administrative rule of prosecutorial cases. It is evident that the closing decision of an interim investigation case is not a word in an official act and it has been expanded based on the procedures in practice. The prosecutor's office has been utilizing the closing decision of an interim investigation case frequently. So far the rulings of Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court were generous on the closing decision of an interim investigation case. The reason was that it had no quality of measurement externally because it was one of the cases dealt inside the prosecutor's office. Because of that, the Constitutional Court dismissed complaining citizen's constitutional petition on the closing decision of an interim investigation case and the Supreme Court rejected the appealing against a prosecutorial decision not to indict to a High Court. In addition, it has become that a defendant and a suspect could not ask for... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2004학년도 학술연구비
의 지원을 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 정치적 사건의 수사 | - |
dc.subject | 형사소송법전 | - |
dc.subject | 사경단계에서의 내사사건 | - |
dc.subject | 사법경찰관리집무규칙 | - |
dc.subject | 검찰단계에서의 내사사건 | - |
dc.subject | 진정사건의 처리방식 | - |
dc.title | 내사종결처분의 법적 성질 | - |
dc.title.alternative | An Analysis on a Closing Decision of an Interim Investigation Case | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Shin, Dong Woon | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 331 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 309-331 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 309 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 45 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.