Publications

Detailed Information

Trade Liberalization of Education Services in Korea : 한국의 교육서비스 무역자유화

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor안덕근-
dc.contributor.author김상미-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T04:21:02Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T04:21:02Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.other000000142055-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/129152-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제학과, 2017. 2. 안덕근.-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT

Education is widely considered as a key factor to economic development for
its strong inputs to economic, social and cultural activities. Notwithstanding education
has long been considered as a non-tradable public good of individual countries within
their borders, international trade regime has introduced the General Agreement on
Trade in Services (GATS) under World Trade Organization (WTO) during the
Uruguay Round of 1991 which included education service as one of the 12 service
sectors eligible to trade. Accordingly, Korea, a member of the WTO, has opened up its
territory to the global trade in education services on a small scale following Doha
Development Agenda (DDA) and a series of Free Trade Agreement (FTA) during
the last decades. The extent of liberalization of education services sector in Korea,
however, has not shown much significant progress.
Some foreign studies identified several challenges related to the
implementation of the GATS commitments. As well, some other Korean studies
attempted to analyze negotiation strategies for Koreas Free Trade Agreeents or presented countermeasures against trade liberalization in this sector. On the other hand,
few have investigated the current Korean education trade situation following several
FTAs of Korea.
Consequently, this paper attempts to investigate the actual outcome of the
liberalization and also look into the realities of Koreas progress in education
liberalization after FTAs. It also aims to identify the trade barriers and policy issues
surrounding the Korean education services trade by studying STC-Korea case. In the
later part of the thesis, it delves into the cases and examples of Singapore, China, and
Japan respectively in order to search for policy implications for Korean education
services domain. Based on the implications, this paper concludes that Korea should
provide integrated governance to foster institutional framework relevant to the
education services liberalization and facilitate socio-economic and educational
infrastructure to cope with the era of globalization and internationalization of the
education services.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter I. Introduction 1

Chapter II. Trade in Education Services under GATS/WTO 4
1. Education in Trade 4
2. Education Services under GATS/WTO 5

Chapter III. Trade Liberalization of Education Services in Korea 11
1. Liberalization of Education Services Trade in Korea 11
2. International Schools in Korea 16
3. Case Study: STC-Korea 25

Chapter IV. Policy Comparison on Internationalization of Higher Education 29
1. Singapore 29
2. Japan 31
3. China 33

Chapter V. Issues in Education Services Domain 37

Chapter VI. Conclusion 42

References 44

국문초록 48
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent4926252 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectEducation Services Trade-
dc.subjectGATS/WTO-
dc.subjectKorean Education Trade-
dc.subjectTrade liberalization-
dc.subjectSTC-Korea-
dc.subject.ddc327-
dc.titleTrade Liberalization of Education Services in Korea-
dc.title.alternative한국의 교육서비스 무역자유화-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages43-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share