Browse

Comparative Review on Domain Name Disputes Resolutions between the WIPO and the IDRC (Korea) Decisions

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Cho, Jung Wook
Issue Date
2012-06
Publisher
BK 21 law
Citation
Journal of Korean Law, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 135-162
Keywords
CybersquattingWorld Intellectual Property OrganizationUniform Domain Dispute Resolution PolicyKoreaAct on Internet Address ResourcesInternet Address Dispute Resolution Committeetrademarkdomain namepassive holdinginitial interest confusion
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the approaches taken by the Uniform Domain Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Act on Internet Address Resources (AIAR) of Korea in dealing with domain name disputes arising from cybersquatting. By examining the WIPO and the Internet Address Dispute Resolution Committee (IDRC) Panel decisions applying the relevant provisions of the UDRP and the AIAR, respectively, this study aims to shed light on how the UDRP and the AIAR are each designed to handle the myriad of complex issues which occur in connection with cybersquatting.
ISSN
1598-1681
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/91453
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) Journal of Korean LawJournal of Korean Law Volume 12 Number 1/2 (2012)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse