Publications

Detailed Information

Tuning Parameter Selection for the Fused Lasso Signal Approximator

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor임요한-
dc.contributor.author손원-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T00:32:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T00:32:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.other000000141252-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/121165-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 통계학과, 2017. 2. 임요한.-
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, we propose a two-stage tuning parameter selection procedure for the fused lasso signal approximator (FLSA).
The FLSA can be used to recover piecewise constant mean vectors by penalizing the differences of the neighboring mean values.
Like other regularized methods, choice of the tuning parameters affects the quality of model selection and estimation.
We find a theoretically optimal fusion parameter for identifying the true changepoints.
As a practical fusion parameter selection procedure, we propose a generalized information criteria (GIC) with theoretical justification.
For any preliminary test statistic which has a piecewise constant mean structure, the adaptive fusion estimator built on the preliminary test statistic gives lower false discovery rate (FDR).
-
dc.description.tableofcontents1 Introduction 1
2 Review of Theoretical Properties of the FLSA 5
2.1. The model 5
2.2. The FLSA and pathwise algorithm 7
2.3. The fusion estimator 8
2.4. Sign-consistency of the FLSA 9
2.4.1. Exact sign-consistency 10
2.4.2. Epsilon-sign-consistency 11
2.4.3. Preconditioned FLSA 13
3 Fusion Estimator for the Detection of True Changepoints 14
3.1. Fusion parameter and recovery of the true changepoints 15
3.2. Theoretical properties of the fusion estimator 16
3.2.1. Sign-inconsistency for staircase blocks 16
3.2.2. Pathwise algorithm 19
3.3. Fusion parameter selection for identification of true changepoints 27
4 Decision Theoretical Tuning Procedure of the FLSA 35
4.1. Tuning of the FLSA 36
4.2. Choice of the fusion parameter 37
4.2.1. Assumptions and tuning procedure 37
4.2.2. Theoretical justification of the GIC selection procedure 39
4.3. Decision theoretical tuning procedure for the l_1 parameter 45
4.3.1. The FDR of the adaptive fusion estimator 45
4.3.2. Choice of the l_1 parameter 51
5 Numerical Studies 53
5.1. Design of the synthetic data 53
5.2. Fusion parameter and the number of true and false changepoints 56
5.3. Choice of the fusion parameter via GIC 59
5.4. FDR of the fusion estimator and the choice of the l_1 parameter 61
6 Conclusion 67
Bibliography 69
국문초록 74
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1130505 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectmultiple changepoints-
dc.subjectfused lasso signal approximator-
dc.subjecttuning parameter selection-
dc.subjectfalse discovery rate-
dc.subject.ddc519-
dc.titleTuning Parameter Selection for the Fused Lasso Signal Approximator-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pagesv, 74-
dc.contributor.affiliation자연과학대학 통계학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share