Publications
Detailed Information
Agricultural Subsidies Rules in GATT/WTO, Rules without Roots : GATT/WTO 농업보조금 규정의 제도적 근원 고찰
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 안덕근 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김민주 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-19T04:10:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-19T04:10:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 000000132144 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/129035 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 국제대학원 : 국제대학원 국제학과, 2016. 2. 안덕근. | - |
dc.description.abstract | The World Trade Organization (WTO) has treated agricultural subsidies as exceptional. This paper delves into the historical origin of the agricultural subsidies rules of the GATT/WTO. During the era of the GATT 1947, agricultural subsidies had been exempted from rules on general subsidies on a product basis. On the other hand, under the Uruguay Round Agreement (URA), subsidies in general began to be regulated under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement) while agricultural subsidies began to be regulated under the Agreement on Agriculture (AA) through the dual-track approach.
This paper pinpoints that the institutionalization of the dual-track approach withinthe URA enabled greater preferential treatment of agricultural products in comparison to manufacturing products. I argue that theincorporation of the GATT 1947 into the URA led the agricultural subsidies rules to be ambiguously attached to the SCM Agreement. Limited applicability of the Peace Clause, treatment of agricultural import substitution subsidies, and treatment of the wrongly categorized domestic support are the three structural problems emerging from the current framework in regulating agricultural subsidies. Based on the implications of the structural inconsistencies, this paper concludes that the long-termconvergence of the SCM Agreement and the AA is required for strengthening the legal consistency of the GATT/WTO subsidies regime. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter I. Introduction 1
1.Agriculture in Trade 1 2.GATT/WTO Regime and the Dynamic Feedback Process 8 3.The Questions 10 Chapter II. Historical Evolution of the GATT/WTO Subsidies Regime 13 1.Havana Charter for an International Trade Organization 13 2.GATT 1947 15 3.The Kennedy Round 23 4.The Tokyo Round (the Subsidies Code) 24 5.The Uruguay Round 26 Chapter III. The Dual-Track Approach in the Uruguay Round 31 1.The SCM Agreement 33 2.Agreement on Agriculture 36 3.Comparison of the Two Agreements 44 4.GATT 1947, the Institutional Legacy 49 Chapter IV.Structural Problems 51 1.Limited Applicability of the Peace Clause 51 2.Treatment of Agricultural Import Substitution Subsidies 54 3.Treatment of Wrongly Categorized Domestic Support 55 Chapter V. Convergence of the Two Agreements 61 1.Previous studies on Convergence 61 2.Why Convergence? 62 3.Principles of the Convergence 66 Chapter VI. Conclusion 70 RERERENCES 71 APPENDIX 81 APPENDIX 1 81 APPENDIX 2 82 APPENDIX 3 83 APPENDIX 4 89 국문초록 93 | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.extent | 3318056 bytes | - |
dc.format.medium | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 국제대학원 | - |
dc.subject | GATT/WTO | - |
dc.subject | Agricultural Subsidies | - |
dc.subject | Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures | - |
dc.subject | Agreement on Agriculture | - |
dc.subject | Institutional Convergence | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 327 | - |
dc.title | Agricultural Subsidies Rules in GATT/WTO, Rules without Roots | - |
dc.title.alternative | GATT/WTO 농업보조금 규정의 제도적 근원 고찰 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Minju Kim | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.citation.pages | 94 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 국제대학원 국제학과 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2016-02 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.