Publications

Detailed Information

The socio-economic transition and health professions education in Mongolia: a qualitative study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorAmgalan, Nomin-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jwa-Seop-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Hee-
dc.contributor.authorBadamdorj, Oyungoo-
dc.contributor.authorRavjir, Oyungerel-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Hyun Bae-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T05:42:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-18T14:45:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-07-
dc.identifier.citationCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2021 Mar 07;19(1):16ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1478-7547-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/174412-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Former socialist countries have undergone a socio-economic transition in recent decades. New challenges for the healthcare system have arisen in the transition economy, leading to demands for better management and development of the health professions. However, few studies have explored the effects of this transition on health professions education. Thus, we investigated the effects of the socio-economic transition on the health professions education system in Mongolia, a transition economy country, and to identify changes in requirements.

Methods
We used a multi-level perspective to explore the effects of the transition, including the input, process, and output levels of the health professions education system. The input level refers to planning and management, the process level refers to the actual delivery of educational services, and the output level refers to issues related to the health professionals, produced by the system. This study utilized a qualitative research design, including document review and interviews with local representatives. Content analysis and the constant comparative method were used for data analysis.

Results
We explored tensions in the three levels of the health professions education system. First, medical schools attained academic authority for planning and management without proper regulation and financial support. The government sets tuition fees, which are the only financial resource of medical schools; thus, medical schools attempt to enroll more students in order to adapt to the market environment. Second, the quality of educational services varies across institutions due to the absence of a core curriculum and differences in the learning environment. After the transition, the number of private medical schools rapidly increased without quality control, while hospitals started their own specialized training programs. Third, health professionals are struggling to maintain their professional values and development in the market environment. Fixed salaries lead to a lack of motivation, and quality evaluation measures more likely reflect government control than quality improvement.

Conclusions
Mongolia continues to face the consequences of the socio-economic transition. Medical schools lack of financial authority, the varying quality of educational services, and poor professional development are the major adverse effects. Finding external financial support, developing a core curriculum, and reforming a payment system are recommended.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectTransition economy-
dc.subjectHealth Professions Education-
dc.subjectMongolia-
dc.titleThe socio-economic transition and health professions education in Mongolia: a qualitative studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor신좌섭-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이승희-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12962-021-00269-5-
dc.citation.journaltitleCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocationko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2021-03-14T05:22:14Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage16ko_KR
dc.citation.volume19ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share