Publications

Detailed Information

Screening of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement by immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization

Cited 235 time in Web of Science Cited 261 time in Scopus
Authors

Paik, Jin Ho; Choe, Gheeyoung; Kim, Hyojin; Choe, Ji-Young; Lee, Hyun Ju; Lee, Choon-Taek; Lee, Jong Seok; Jheon, Sanghoon; Chung, Jin-Haeng

Issue Date
2011-03
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Citation
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Vol.6 No.3, pp.466-472
Abstract
Background: The use of a standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay to detect the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein in lung cancer is challenging. There are no universally accepted, evidence-based guidelines on identifying patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer using IHC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 465 resected specimens of non-small cell lung cancer using a tissue microarray as a test set. ALK protein expression using IHC with 5A4 monoclonal antibody (Novocastra) and ALK gene rearrangement using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with dual-color break-apart probes (Abbott molecular) were examined. Immunoreactivity was scored as 0, 1, 2, or 3, and the results were compared with the FISH results. A diagnostic algorithm was derived from the correlation of the IHC and FISH results and applied to an additional 187 adenocarcinoma samples used as a validation set. Results: In the test set, ALK protein expression was detected in 40 patients (40/465, 8.6%), consisting of IHC scores of 1 (n = 14), 2 (n = 10), and 3 (n = 16), whereas 19 patients (19/453, 4.2%) were FISH-positive. All the FISH-positive patients were assigned IHC scores of 2 or 3. All the patients with ALK IHC scores of 3 were FISH-positive, those with scores of 0 or 1 were FISH-negative, and those with scores of 2 were FISH variable. In the validation set, ALK protein expression was detected in 14 patients (scores of 1, n = 2; scores of 2, n = 6; and scores of 3, n = 6), of which nine patients (9/187, 4.8%) were FISH-positive. All the patients with IHC scores of 0 or 1 were FISH-negative, and those with scores of 3 were FISH-positive. Among the patients with IHC scores of 2, three (3/6, 50%) were FISH-positive. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of IHC was 100% and 95.8%, respectively. These data supported an IHC scoring algorithm in which ALK IHC scores of 0, 1, or 3 were highly compatible with FISH results, and IHC scores of 2 were variable. Based on these findings, the IHC assay using the 5A4 antibody reliably detected non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement and may be useful as a screening method to identify these tumors.
ISSN
1556-0864
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/192120
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820b82e8
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

Paik, Jin Ho Image

Paik, Jin Ho백진호
(기금)부교수
  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Hematopathology, Head and Neck Pathology, Renal Pathology

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share