Publications

Detailed Information

Recalibration and Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in Korean Incident Hemodialysis Patients

Cited 20 time in Web of Science Cited 23 time in Scopus
Authors

Park, Jae Yoon; Kim, Myoung-Hee; Han, Seung Seok; Cho, Hyunjeong; Kim, Ho; Ryu, Dong-Ryeol; Kim, Hyunwook; Lee, Hajeong; Lee, Jung Pyo; Lim, Chun-Soo; Kim, Kyoung Hoon; Joo, Kwon Wook; Kim, Yon Su; Kim, Dong Ki

Issue Date
2015-05
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Citation
PLoS ONE, Vol.10 No.5, p. e0127240
Abstract
Background Weights assigned to comorbidities to predict mortality may vary based on the type of index disease and advances in the management of comorbidities. We aimed to develop a modified Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in incident hemodialysis patients (mCCI-IHD), thereby improving risk stratification for mortality. Methods Data on 24,738 Koreans who received their first hemodialysis treatment between 2005 and 2008 were obtained from the Korean Health Insurance dataset. The mCCI-IHD score were calculated by summing up the weights which were assigned to individual comorbidities according to their relative prognostic significance determined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. The modified index was validated in an independent nationwide prospective cohort (n=1,100). Results The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that all comorbidities in the CCI except ulcers significantly predicted mortality. Thus, the mCCI-IHD included 14 comorbidities with reassigned severity weights. In the validation cohort, both the CCI and the mCCI-IHD were correlated with mortality. However, the mCCI-IHD showed modest but significant increases in c statistics compared with the CCI at 6 months and 1 year. The analyses using continuous net reclassification improvement revealed that the mCCI-IHD improved net mortality risk reclassification by 24.6% (95% CI, 2.5-46.7; P=0.03), 26.2% (95% CI, 1.0-51.4; P=0.04) and 42.8%(95% CI, 4.9-80.8; P=0.03) with respect to the CCI at 6 months and 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusions The mCCI-IHD facilitates better risk stratification for mortality in incident hemodialysis patients compared with the CCI, suggesting that it may be a preferred index for use in clinical practice and the statistical analysis of epidemiological studies.
ISSN
1932-6203
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/207230
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127240
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Nephrology, Transplantation, Urology

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share