Browse

Diagnostic usefulness of a T-cell based assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Cited 88 time in Web of Science Cited 100 time in Scopus
Authors
Kim, Sung-Han; Choi, Su-Jin; Kim, Hong-Bin; Kim, Nam-Joong; Oh, Myoung-Don; Choe, Kang-Won
Issue Date
2007-11-14
Publisher
American Medical Association
Citation
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12;167(20):2255-9.
Keywords
AdultAgedAntigens, Bacterial/diagnostic useBacterial Proteins/diagnostic use*Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityT-Lymphocytes/*immunology*Tuberculin TestTuberculosis/*diagnosis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (E-TB) remains a challenge. A recently developed Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific region of difference 1 gene-based assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection showed promising results. However, the diagnostic usefulness of this assay remains to be determined compared with tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with suspected E-TB in clinical practice. METHODS: All patients with suspected E-TB were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary care hospital during a 9-month period. In addition to the conventional tests for diagnosing E-TB, the interferon gamma-producing T-cell responses to early secreted antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10 by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay were performed. Final diagnosis in patients having suspected E-TB was classified by clinical category. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with suspected E-TB were enrolled; 34 (47%) had immunosuppressive conditions. Of 72 patients, 32 (44%) were classified as having E-TB, including 22 with confirmed tuberculosis and 10 with probable tuberculosis, and 35 (49%) were classified as not having tuberculosis. The remaining 5 (7%) had possible tuberculosis and were excluded from the final analysis. Chronic caseating granulomas, acid-fast bacilli stain, M tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction, and cultures for M tuberculosis were positive in 22 (69%), 5 (16%), 15 (47%), and 18 (56%), respectively, of 32 patients with E-TB. The sensitivity and specificity of the TST (induration size, > or =10 mm) were 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-65%) and 86% (95% CI, 70%-95%), respectively. By comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISPOT assay were 94% (95% CI, 79%-99%; P < .001 between TST and ELISPOT) and 88% (95% CI, 72%-97%; P =.99 between TST and ELISPOT), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ELISPOT assay is a useful adjunct test for diagnosing E-TB.
ISSN
0003-9926 (Print)
Language
English
URI
http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/20/2255

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17998500

https://hdl.handle.net/10371/29552
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.20.2255
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Internal Medicine (내과학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_내과학전공)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse